Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Depressive symptoms in individuals with family members requiring ADL assistance

Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine volume 24, Article number: 49 (2019) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 28 August 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The number of patients with depressive symptoms worldwide is increasing steadily, and the prevalence of depression among caregivers is high. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the effects of individuals’ caregiving status with respect to their family members requiring activities of daily living (ADLs) assistance on depressive symptoms among those aged 45 or over.

Methods

Data were collected from the 2006–2016 using the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging surveys. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their caregiving status with respect to family members requiring ADL assistance: whether they provided the assistance themselves, whether the assistance was provided by other caregivers, or whether no assistance was required. We analyzed the generalized estimating equation model and subgroups.

Results

A total of 3744 men and 4386 women were included for the analysis. Men who cared for family members requiring ADL assistance had higher depressive symptoms than those with family members who did not require ADL assistance. Among women, participants who had family members requiring ADL assistance that they themselves or others were providing had higher depressive symptoms than those without family members requiring ADL assistance. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on age, job status, regular physical activities, participation status in social activities, and the number of cohabiting generations.

Conclusions

The study results indicated higher depressive symptoms among those with family members requiring ADL assistance and those who care for such family members themselves. This suggests that an alternative to family caregiving is necessary, especially for the elderly, regardless of caregiver sex.

Background

More than 300 million people worldwide have depression symptoms, and the number of depressed people increased by 18.4% between 2005 and 2015 [1, 2]. In South Korea, the number of depressed patients increased from 590,000 in 2012 to about 640,000 in 2016, an increase of over 50,000 people in just 4 years. An analysis of the number of depression patients by age group in 2016 showed that 55–59-year-olds had the highest rate of depression and that the overall depression distribution of middle-aged and senior individuals was generally high [3]. A complex interaction of psychological, social, or biological factors contributes to depression [4]. Various previous studies showed that the number of chronic health conditions [5, 6], cognitive impairment [7, 8], low exercise level [1, 9, 10], functional limitations [6, 9, 11], lack of social support [12], negative life events [13, 14], and other stressful events can affect depressive symptoms either directly or indirectly.

Among diverse stressful events, one of the factors that cause depression is caregiving provision to family patients [15, 16]. Particularly, the presence of family members requiring help in daily living can affect caregivers both physically and mentally. In fact, reports have shown that family caregivers often experience depressive symptoms when providing care for family members in terms of help in daily living due to various conditions [17, 18]. Previous studies on activities of daily living (ADL) patients and depression have indicated a high correlation between the two factors [19,20,21] and correspondingly, other studies have examined the mental health of caregivers who provide care for ADL patients [22, 23]. Among the related studies reported using the same KLoSA data as in this study, the degree of depression of a cohabiting spouse was also determined depending on the level of cognitive abilities of the spouse in need of care [24]. Additionally, family caregiving negatively affects not only the health but also the level of life satisfaction of caregivers [25], with the level of influence showing differences according to sex.

Therefore, this study examined the level of depressive symptoms of family caregivers according to caregiver sex by dividing the participants into three different groups according to their caregiving status. Specifically, caregiving status was categorized as the following: (1) individuals who help and provide care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves, (2) individuals who have family members who are provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers, and (3) individuals who have no family members requiring ADL assistance. The ADL criteria for this study were patients who required assistance with at least one of the categories of ADL assessment (feeding, dressing, grooming, physical ambulation, showering, and personal hygiene).

Methods

Study population

This study was carried out using data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) for the years 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016. The KLoSA is a longitudinal study by the Korean Labor Institute targeting Korean individuals aged 45 years or older in households selected by multistage-stratified probability sampling (based on geographical area) to be representative of the nation. The surveys are carried out biennially through a computer-assisted personal interviewing technique and cover topics including demographics, family and social networks, physical and mental health, employment and retirement, income, and wealth.

There were a total 10,254 individual participants in the first baseline survey in 2006. Among these participants, 760 individuals had family members who need help regarding ADLs. The 2008 follow-up survey data contained 8688 individuals, the 2010 follow-up survey 7920 individuals, the 2012 follow-up survey 7486 individuals, the 2014 follow-up survey 7949 individuals (including 920 newly added participants), and the 2016 follow-up survey 7490 individuals (including 872 newly added participants).

Participants who had missing data for the variables used in this study were excluded. Hence, we excluded participants who were already receiving drugs for depression or for symptoms of depression. This led to the final inclusion of 8130 participants, including 3744 males and 4386 females, in the 2006 baseline study population.

Measures

Depressive symptoms

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D 10), an indicator of the degree of depression, based on caregiver status with respect to a family member requiring ADL assistance. Depressive symptoms were assessed using CES-D 10 developed by the Boston site of Established Populations for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly [26]. The CES-D 10 has 10 items that can be answered in a “Yes” or “No” format, and the total score is between zero and 10. On the CES-D 10, a total score of 4 or above is considered indicative of depression. Its validity as a test tool for older adults has been evaluated and proven [27, 28], and the Korean version of the CES-D has also been validated in the Korean population (Cronbach’s α = 0.909) [29].

Caregiving status and activities of daily living (ADLs)

ADLs can be divided into two areas: basic ADLs and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). ADLs require basic skills and focus on activities to take care of one’s own body. They include personal hygiene, continence management, dressing, feeding, and ambulating [30, 31]. IADLs include companionship and mental support, transportation and shopping, preparing meals, managing a person’s household, managing medications, communicating with others, and managing finances [32, 33]. In this study, we focused on basic ADLs and classified categories according to whether family members face difficulties in daily living. We divided the individuals into three categories according to their caregiving status with respect to their family members requiring ADL assistance: “Yes, by others,” “Yes, by myself,” and “No family members requiring ADL assistance.”

Covariates

Sociodemographic and health-related covariates were included in the present study. The included covariates were age (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and ≥ 75), education level (elementary school or less, middle school, high school, university, or beyond), region (metropolitan, rural), working status (working or non-working), equalized household income (low, mid-low, mid-high, high), perceived health status (healthy, average, unhealthy), regular physical activities status (yes or no), participation status in social activities (yes or no), alcohol intake status (yes or no), smoking status (ever or never), the number of chronic diseases (none, 1, ≥ 2), and the number of cohabiting generations (couple, two generations, more than two generations). In the case of participation status in social activities, “yes” indicated participating in at least one of the categories of religion, leisure, friendship, hometown alumni meetings, and volunteering, and “no” indicated not participating in any of them.

Statistical analysis

The general characteristics of the study participants were examined using t tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare differences in CES-D 10 scores and standard deviations. In analyzing the association between caregiving status of family members who need help with ADLs and depression scores, the generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression model, which is an extension of the quasi-likelihood approach used to analyze longitudinal correlated data, was used. The KLoSA was used in this study because it is longitudinal and contains yearly repeated measurements of the same individuals based on the first baseline data. Individuals originally included in the 2006 baseline year and their CES-D 10 scores were continuously followed up and measured in 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on age, job status, regular physical activities, participation status in social activities, and the number of cohabiting generations to investigate the influence of these factors on the relationship between family members’ ADL status and depressive symptoms. Analysis was stratified by sex to visualize whether different patterns exist between men and women. Since previous studies have shown that women experience a higher burden than men in similar caregiving situations [34,35,36], it is expected that there will be sex differences regarding the care of family members in this study as well. The calculated P values in the present study were all two-sided and considered significant at P < 0.05. All the analyses were carried out using the SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Participants’ characteristics as recorded for the first wave of the study are presented in Table 1. The 8130 total participants were categorized into 3744 men and 4386 women. The total mean CES-D 10 scores of men and women were 2.285 ± 2.178 and 2.758 ± 2.441, respectively. Among the 3744 male participants, 170 (4.5%) individuals had family members who were provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers, 84 (2.2%) individuals helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves, and 3490 (93.2%) individuals did not have family members requiring ADL assistance. The mean CES-D 10 scores were 2.171 ± 1.979 for the group with family members who were provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers, 2.774 ± 2.456 for the group who helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves, and 2.279 ± 2.179 for the group who did not have family members requiring ADL assistance.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population by CES-D 10
Full size table

With regard to the 4386 women in this study, 222 (5.1%) had family members who were provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers, 124 (2.8%) provided the care themselves, and 4040 (92.1%) did not have family members requiring ADL assistance. The mean CES-D 10 scores were 2.806 ± 2.452 for the group with family members who were provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers, 3.573 ± 2.632 for the group who helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves, and 2.730 ± 2.430 for the group who had no family members requiring ADL assistance.

Table 2 describes the relationship between CES-D 10 and the caregiving status of individuals with respect to family members requiring ADL assistance. Among men, those who had family members requiring ADL assistance for whom they provided care themselves had higher CES-D 10 scores (β 0.407, P = 0.0051) than those who did not have family members requiring ADL assistance. In women, those with family members requiring ADL assistance provided by other caregivers and those providing care themselves had higher depression scores (β 0.210, P = 0.0123 and β 0.506, P < 0.0001, respectively) than those who did not have family members requiring ADL assistance. In addition, in the case of women, the relationship between caregiving status of family members requiring ADL assistance and depressive symptoms showed a trend of increasing depressive symptoms in older age, and higher depression scores were obtained in the 65–74 years old group and the 75 years-or-older group (β 0.226, P = 0.0010 and β 0.082, P < 0.0001, respectively). In the case of men, regarding educational levels, those with lower educational levels tended to have more depressive symptoms than those in the university-or-beyond group (elementary school or less (β), 0.460; middle school (β), 0.272; high school (β), 0.164).

Table 2 Results of analysis of factors associated with CES-D 10 scores
Full size table

The results of the analysis of the association between CES-D 10 and caregiving status of family members requiring ADL assistance stratified by age, working status, regular physical activities, participation in social activities, and the number of cohabiting generations are presented in Table 3. Among men, those who helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves showed statistically significant results in each subgroup. Regarding age, higher depression scores were observed in the 65–74 years old group (β 0.597, P = 0.0135) and the 75 years-or-older group (β 0.832, P = 0.0088). Regarding working status, higher depression scores were observed in the non-working group (β 0.686, P = 0.0011). Lastly, regarding regular physical activities, higher depression scores were observed among those not engaging in regular physical activities (β 0.444, P = 0.0222).

Table 3 Results of subgroup analysis of caregiving for ADL family members with CES-D 10
Full size table

Among women, those who helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves showed statistically significant results in each subgroup. Regarding age, higher depression scores were observed in the 55–64 years old group (β 0.518, P = 0.0226) and the 65–74 years old group (β 0.923, P = 0.0009). Regarding working status, higher depression scores were observed in both the working (β 0.709, P = 0.0093) and the non-working (β 0.473, P = 0.0009) groups. Regarding the number of cohabiting generations, higher depression scores were observed in the more-than-two-generations group (β 0.783, P = 0.0059). Females with family members who were provided with care and ADL assistance by other caregivers also showed higher depression scores in the cohabiting-with-more-than-two-generations group (β 0.482, P = 0.0492).

Discussion

After being adjusted for potential confounders, the results revealed that those individuals who helped and provided care to family members who require ADL assistance by themselves also showed higher depressive symptoms. In the case of men, those who provided ADL assistance to family members by themselves had higher depressive symptoms than those who did not have family members requiring ADL assistance. In the case of women, those with family members who were provided care and ADL assistance by other caregivers showed higher depressive symptoms as well.

In the subgroup analysis, age, working status, regular physical activities, participation in social activities, and the number of cohabiting generations were significantly associated with depressive symptoms in both men and women. In the case of men, depressive symptoms worsened for the age groups 65–74 years and ≥ 75 years if the participants were caring for family members requiring ADL assistance. In the case of women, depressive symptoms worsened for the age groups 55–64 years and 65–74 years if the participants were caring for family members requiring ADL assistance. In addition, among men, those who were cohabiting with spouses and engaging in caregiving by themselves were more likely to have depressive symptoms. Among women, those who were cohabiting with spouses or with more than two generations while caring for their family members requiring ADL assistance were more likely to have depressive symptoms. Furthermore, our findings that participants who are living with and caring for spouses requiring ADL assistance have higher depressive symptoms, particularly in women, supports the results of previous studies showing that participants living with spouses with a greater degree of dementia exhibited higher depression scores [24].

The other findings from this study are also consistent with previous studies that ADL assistance is primarily required as a consequence of stroke or dementia that occur as a result of aging [37, 38]. Korea has become an aging society, with a population of over the age of 65 exceeding 14% in 2017, and it is expected that the size and proportion of the population aged 80 and above will increase at a faster pace [39]. It can be predicted that, over time, the proportion of the population with ADL dependence will increase due to the chronic diseases caused by the increase in the proportion of elderly people. As reported in this study, depression was found to be high in both men and women when providing ADL assistance to family members. In women, those with family members requiring ADL assistance provided by other caregivers showed higher depressive symptoms, inferring that women are more likely to feel burdensome and, as a result, become more vulnerable to depression than men [34, 36, 40].

Previous studies have shown that high depressive symptoms and negative life satisfaction were associated with caring for a spouse or elderly family members [25, 41,42,43]. Considering that caregivers are generally middle-aged or older, such depressive symptoms and negative life satisfaction affecting these caregivers may be a sufficient risk factor for future physical illnesses, such as a declining competence in daily living and falls [44, 45]. On the other hand, it has also been reported that receiving care at home rather than in a nursing home is more effective for managing depressive symptoms and life satisfaction in patients [46]. Since the majority of ADL patients are, therefore, cared for by family members, the risk of depressive symptoms for caregivers needs particular attention. In Korea, depressive symptoms observed in family caregiving situations are particularly important because about 72% of patients with dementia are cared for by family members [47]. Therefore, appropriate support and measures are needed to reduce depressive effects among individuals who are cohabiting while family members receive care at home.

The KLoSA uses well-established data that has been conducted on middle-aged or older individuals, but it has some limitations. First, through the use of these data, we were unable to identify the extent of support required for the family members requiring ADL assistance. However, the study offers general statistical results. Second, we could not determine if other family members besides the study participants or external caregivers were providing ADL assistance for those individuals categorized as having family members who were being provided ADL assistance. Third, ADL is mainly used for evaluating dementia [48, 49], and it is also an important criterion for judging the effectiveness of dementia treatment [50]. In other words, ADL is generally an indicator of evaluation related to dementia. However, in the KLoSA questionnaire, it was unclear what caused participants’ family members to require ADL assistance. Fourth, the number of participants who helped their family members with ADL assistance was relatively small. Fifth, there are other factors that can affect the depression levels of middle-aged and senior individuals in addition to those incorporated in this study. However, due to data limitations, we were unable to consider all such potential causes. Finally, we could not clarify how many family members needed assistance in each family. Depending on the number of cohabiting generations, in the case of “couple,” we may know how many family members needed assistance, but if individuals belonged to the “two generations” or “more than two generations” group, we were not able to confirm this information.

To further develop the study findings, a variety of systems and further studies are needed on the mental health of the caregiver.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that both men and women have higher depressive symptoms among those with family members requiring ADL assistance and those who care for such members themselves than those who do not have family members requiring ADL assistance. In addition, there are also significant associations showing that among those who care for family members requiring ADL assistance, depressive symptoms tended to increase with their ages. Therefore, it is important that an alternative to family caregiving is necessary, especially for the elderly.

Availability of data and materials

This study’s data are generated and analyzed from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) and these longitudinal data are available from the Korean Labor Institute ( https://survey.keis.or.kr/index.jsp).

Change history

  • 28 August 2019

    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Table 2 in their paper. The table entry “Men’s P value” was mistakenly included under the table heading “Women”. The original article [1] has been updated.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities of daily living

CES-D:

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale

GEE:

Generalized estimating equation

IADL:

Instrumental activities of daily living

KLoSA:

The Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging

References

  1. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016;388:1545–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Healthcare Bigdata Hub. Disease sub-category statistics. 2018. http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olap3thDsInfo.do. Accessed 12 June 2018.

  4. Teasdale JD. Negative thinking in depression: cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship? ADV Behav Res Ther. 1983;5:3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams KB, Sanders S, Auth E. Loneliness and depression in independent living retirement communities: risk and resilience factors. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8:475–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braam AW, Prince MJ, Beekman AT, Delespaul P, Dewey ME, Geerlings S, et al. Physical health and depressive symptoms in older Europeans: Results from EURODEP. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Minicuci N, Maggi S, Pavan M, Enzi G, Crepaldi G. Prevalence rate and correlates of depressive symptoms in older individuals: the Veneto Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M155–M61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biderman A, Cwikel J, Fried A, Galinsky D. Depression and falls among community dwelling elderly people: a search for common risk factors. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:631–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gazmararian J, Baker D, Parker R, Blazer DG. A multivariate analysis of factors associated with depression: evaluating the role of health literacy as a potential contributor. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3307–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E, Corbeau C. Cross-sectional and prospective study of exercise and depressed mood in the elderly: the Rancho Bernardo study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:596–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hybels CF, Blazer DG, Pieper CF. Toward a threshold for subthreshold depression: an analysis of correlates of depression by severity of symptoms using data from an elderly community sample. Gerontologist. 2001;41:357–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings SM, Neff JA, Husaini BA. Functional impairment as a predictor of depressive symptomatology: the role of race, religiosity, and social support. Health Soc Work. 2003;28:23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraaij V, De Wilde E. Negative life events and depressive symptoms in the elderly: a life span perspective. Aging Ment Health. 2001;5:84–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glass TA, Kasl SV, Berkman LF. Stressful life events and depressive symptoms among the elderly: Evidence from a prospective community study. J Aging Health. 1997;9:70–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. J Soc Work Educ. 2008;44(sup3):105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schulz R, Martire LM. Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12(3):240–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jácome C, Figueiredo D, Gabriel R, Cruz J, Marques A. Predicting anxiety and depression among family carers of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26:1191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schulz R, O'Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist. 1995;35:771–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holroyd S, Currie LJ, Wooten GF. Depression is associated with impairment of ADL, not motor function in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2005;64:2134–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Covinsky KE, Newcomer R, Fox P, Wood J, Sands L, Dane K, et al. Patient and caregiver characteristics associated with depression in caregivers of patients with dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:1006–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim BJ, Liu L, Nakaoka S, Jang S, Browne C. Depression among older Japanese Americans: The impact of functional (ADL & IADL) and cognitive status. Soc Work Health Care. 2018;57:109–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sallim AB, Sayampanathan AA, Cuttilan A, Ho RC-M. Prevalence of mental health disorders among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16:1034–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HJ, Seo JM, Ahn SH. The role of social support in the relationship between stress and depression among family caregivers of older adults with dementia. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003;33:713–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim W, Lee TH, Shin J, Park EC. Depressive symptoms in spouse caregivers of dementia patients: A longitudinal study in South Korea. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17:973–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakabayashi M, Kureishi W. Differences in the effects of informal family caregiving on health and life satisfaction between wives and husbands as caregivers. Rev Dev Econ. 2018;22(3):1063–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohout FJ, Berkman LF, Evans DA, Cornoni-Huntley J. Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. J Aging Health. 1993;5:179–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN. Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(15):1701–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1993;32(3):381–99.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sikkes S, De Lange-de Klerk E, Pijnenburg Y, Scheltens P. A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: room for improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:7–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gold DA. An examination of instrumental activities of daily living assessment in older adults and mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:11–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallicchio L, Siddiqi N, Langenberg P, Baumgarten M. Gender differences in burden and depression among informal caregivers of demented elders in the community. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17(2):154–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bédard M, Chambers L, Molloy DW, Lever JA, Stones MJ, Martin NJ. The impact of Alzheimer's disease on caregivers is gender-specific. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kramer BJ, Kipnis S. Eldercare and work-role conflict: Toward an understanding of gender differences in caregiver burden. Gerontologist. 1995;35(3):340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakayama H, Jørgensen H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25:808–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ryu HS. A study on ADL and dementia of aged person with medicaid in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2001;31:139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Statistics Korea. 2017 Elderly statistics. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10:173–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Oshio T. Mental health among middle-aged and older adults-evidence from a nationwide panel survey in Japan. Econ Rev. 2014;65(4):332–44.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beeson RA. Loneliness and depression in spousal caregivers of those with Alzheimer’s disease versus non-caregiving spouses. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2003;17:135–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Langa KM, Valenstein MA, Fendrick AM, Kabeto MU, Vijan S. Extent and cost of informal caregiving for older Americans with symptoms of depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:857–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ouyang P, Sun W. The association between depressive symptoms and fall accidents among middle-aged and elderly people in China. Environ Health Prev Med. 2018;23:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Okabayashi S, Kawamura T, Wakai K, Ando M, Tsushita K, Ohira H, Ukawa S, Tamakoshi A. Lifestyle and psychosocial factors and a decline in competence in daily living among Japanese early elderly people: from an age-specified community-based cohort study (NISSIN project). Environ Health Prev Med. 2019;24:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nikmat AW, Al-Mashoor SH, Hashim NA. Quality of life in people with cognitive impairment: nursing homes versus home care. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27:815–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ministry of Health and Welfare RoK. National dementia strategy. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Juva K, MÄKELÄ M, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, YUKOSKI R, Valvanne J, et al. Functional assessment scales in detecting dementia. Age ageing. 1997;26:393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fieo R, Zahodne L, Tang MX, Manly JJ, Cohen R, Stern Y. The historical progression from ADL scrutiny to IADL to advanced ADL: assessing functional status in the earliest stages of dementia. J Gerontol. 2017;73(12):1695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jorm A, Korten A. Assessment of cognitive decline in the elderly by informant interview. Br J Psychiatry. 1988;152:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Korean Labor Institute for providing the KLoSA data.

Funding

There are no funding sources to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Junhyun Kwon, Woorim Kim & Dong-Woo Choi

  2. Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Junhyun Kwon, Eun-Cheol Park, Woorim Kim, Dong-Woo Choi & Sung-In Jang

  3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea

    Eun-Cheol Park & Sung-In Jang

  4. Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Woorim Kim

Authors
  1. Junhyun Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eun-Cheol Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Woorim Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong-Woo Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sung-In Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JK and SIJ designed the study, collected the data, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JK, SIJ, ECP, WK, and DWC contributed to the discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript. SIJ is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all of the data. SIJ assumes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-In Jang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: the table entry “Men’s P value” was mistakenly included under the table heading “Women”. This has now been updated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, J., Park, EC., Kim, W. et al. Depressive symptoms in individuals with family members requiring ADL assistance. Environ Health Prev Med 24, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0804-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0804-x

Keywords

Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

ISSN: 1347-4715

Contact us