Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Review
  • Published:

Environmental and biological monitoring of persistent fluorinated compounds in Japan and their toxicities

Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine volume 14, pages 7–19 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) comprise a class of per- and poly-fluorinated compounds that have been detected in the environment as well as in humans. The aim of this review is to summarize several monitoring studies in Japan and characterize the toxicokinetics of these compounds. We found that the levels of contamination by these compounds had unique patterns in Japan. The levels of PFOA in serum from inhabitants of the Kansai region were higher than those of other regions. The PFOA levels in air and water samples from the Kansai region were also relatively high. The estimated intakes from these routes partly explain the differences in the serum levels. The toxicokinetics of these compounds have been investigated. Serum samples from male participants had significantly higher geometric means for PFOS and PFOA compared to samples from female participants. This sex-related difference was partly simulated by menstrual blood loss. There are large interspecies differences in the excretion pathways of these compounds. The serum clearances of PFOA via urine were 300–1,000-fold lower in humans than in Wistar rats and Japanese macaques. On the other hand, the biliary excretion of these compounds was comparable in rats and humans, and the long half-lives in humans may be attributable to the low levels of urinary excretion and high biliary reabsorption rates. These findings suggest that qualitative differences in the excretion routes exist between humans and other species. For risk assessment of these compounds, further information regarding sources of exposure and their toxicokinetics is needed.

Introduction

Per- and poly-fluorinated compounds (PFCs), of which representative chemicals include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), are a class of specialty chemicals used in a variety of applications. PFOS has been used in lubricants, metal plating, coating formulations, fire-fighting foams, oil and water repellents for leather, paper and textiles, and so on [1]. PFOA has various applications similar to PFOS, but has also been used as a processing aid in fluoropolymer manufacture for over 50 years [2]. PFCs exhibit advantageous physical and chemical properties, which include chemical stability, thermal inertness, and low surface energy, among others.

The estimated historical global PFOA production and emission from fluoropolymer manufacture are in the range of 4,400–8,000 and 3,200–6,900 t, respectively [3]. The global production of PFOS fluoride, a precursor of PFOS, from 1985 to 2002 by 3M Company is estimated to have been 13,670 t [4].

In 2002, however, after 50 years of production, 3M Company, one of the largest companies that produced these compounds, phased out their manufacture because of their persistence in the environment [5]. Despite this, several fluoropolymer manufacturers began producing PFOA as a fluoropolymer processing aid [2].

PFOA and PFOS have been found globally in a variety of living organisms, including humans and wildlife [6, 7]. Many studies have revealed that these compounds have various toxicities toward living organisms, including humans [8–11]. PFOS has been regulated at various levels by governments, including those of the USA [12], Canada [13], and the European Union (EU) [14]. In the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), the third meeting of the POPs review committee decided to recommend PFOS for listing in Annex A or B of the convention [4]. Following the restriction of PFOS marketing in the EU, the issue of whether PFOA should be included in Directive 76/769/EEC has been discussed. The Environmental Protection Agency of the USA launched a stewardship program, and manufacturers have committed to reducing PFOA emissions [15].

Recent studies have revealed a unique situation in Japan, namely that PFOA contamination has progressed more profoundly than PFOS contamination [16, 17]. In agreement with these observations, serum concentrations in Japanese, albeit limited to subpopulations of Japan, are reported to be higher than those in US populations, while the opposite is true for PFOS [18, 19].

The present review has two main aims. First, we review the environmental and biological monitoring of PFOS and PFOA in Japan. Second, we characterize the toxicokinetics of PFOS and PFOA. We have compared data obtained in Japan with those obtained in other countries as required to clarify the unique situation in Japan.

Distributions of PFOA and PFOS in the water environment in Japan

Several studies have reported the concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in surface water in Japan [17, 20–23], and the data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Levels of PFOA and PFOS in water in Japan and several other countries
Full size table

The geometric mean concentrations of PFOA in five regions were within the range of 1–3 ng/l, except for the Kansai region. In the Kansai region, the PFOA concentrations in surface water were much higher than those in other regions [17, 21]. A systematic investigation of the Kanzaki River system by our group revealed that there is a single source of PFOA within the Ai River [17], which was confirmed by Nguyen et al. [21]. The concentrations of PFOA in other countries are also shown in Table 1 [24–27]. These values are relatively higher than the values in Japan, excluding the Kansai region. Local intense contaminations were also observed in other countries, for example, the Tennessee River near Decatur, the Ruhr River, and Etobicoke Creek. The identified sources could be related to fluorochemical manufacturers, sewage treatment plant effluents, and fire-fighting foam [17, 24, 25].

The current surface water PFOS contaminations are shown in Table 1. The PFOS concentrations in Japan were relatively high in the Kanto and Kansai regions [17, 22]. Sewage treatment plant effluents exhibited high concentrations of PFOS as well as PFOA. High concentrations of PFOS were found in wastewater around airports [17]. However, detailed information regarding the types of fire-fighting foams used was not available.

The concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in drinking water in Japan have been reported [28, 29]. The levels of PFOA were extremely high in the Kansai region, especially Osaka [28], where the water supply is mainly derived from the Yodo River. On the other hand, the PFOS levels in tap water were higher in the Kanto region than in other regions [29]. It is therefore possible that the serum levels of these compounds in residents may be proportional to the levels in tap waters.

Distributions of PFOA and PFOS in outdoor air and indoor dust in Japan

There are limited numbers of reports regarding airborne and indoor levels of PFOA and PFOS. Harada et al. [30] showed that the concentrations of PFOA detected within urban atmospheric particles were 50-fold higher than those of PFOS. The amounts of PFOA and PFOS in the respirable fraction (1.1–11.4 µm) ranged from 58.3 to 89.8% of the total amounts [31]. The levels of PFOS and PFOA were significantly higher in the urban atmosphere of Oyamazaki than in the suburban atmospheres of Morioka and Fukuchiyama [30, 32]. Across Japan, there was a tendency for PFOA to be the predominant contaminant of outdoor air, particularly in Osaka [33]. Boulanger et al. [34] reported that the mean concentration of PFOS in particulate-phase air samples was 6.4 pg/m3 (SD 3.3) in the Great Lakes. In Manchester, PFOA and PFOS were both detected at relatively high concentrations (341 and 46 pg/m3, respectively) [35].

The concentrations in indoor dust in Japan ranged from 18 to 3,700 ng/g dust for PFOA and from 7 to 2,500 ng/g dust for PFOS [36, 37]. Compared with outdoor dust, the PFOS levels in indoor dust were comparable, but there are few reports regarding the PFOA levels in indoor dust (Table 2). A study in the USA reported that indoor dust contained higher levels of PFOS than PFOA [38]. The variations in the proportions of various fluorochemicals may reflect the source signatures caused by the use of different composites during the application or manufacturing process [39] (Table 3).

Table 2 PFOA and PFOS levels in outdoor air and indoor dust in Japan and several other countries
Full size table
Table 3 PFOA and PFOS levels in food samples and their daily intakes
Full size table

The sources of PFOA in the environment remain unclear. However, degradation of fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) with atmospheric lifetimes of approximately 10–20 days is speculated to be a source of PFOA [40]. FTOHs are currently produced and used as intermediates for the synthesis of coatings, polymers, inks, adhesives, waxes, and so on. Oono et al. [41, 42] reported that the airborne levels of several FTOHs were significantly higher in the Kyoto-Osaka area than in other areas. Taken together, the higher levels of airborne PFOA in the Kyoto-Osaka area may be caused by the high levels of FTOHs in the air.

Levels of PFOA and PFOS in food and dietary intakes

PFOA and PFOS concentrations in food samples have been reported for food duplicates [33, 43] and total diet studies (TDSs) [44]. The estimated daily dietary intakes of PFOA and PFOS were within the same ranges in Japan and other countries. Although no geographical differences in the dietary intakes were obvious, the serum levels of PFOA were higher in the Osaka area [33, 45]. A TDS in Canada showed that dietary intake of PFOS was mainly derived from beef and fish, while PFOA originated from beef and microwave popcorn [44]. Owing to PFOS bioaccumulation in the environment, fish seem to represent important routes of exposure [46]. In addition, several food packaging coatings for oil- and moisture-resistance are made from fluorochemicals that may degrade into PFOA and PFOS [47].

Estimated daily intakes of PFOA and PFOS in Japanese

Exposure levels to PFOA and PFOS have been estimated using their concentrations in indoor dust, outdoor air, tap water, consumed items, and diet. It was estimated that the adult intake of indoor dust is 50 mg/day [48], the adult intake of tap water is 1.3 l/day, and adult humans inspire 13.3 m3 of air/day; 69 and 74% of particles in air are respirable for PFOA and PFOS, respectively, and PFOA and PFOS in each medium are completely absorbed into the body.

The estimated exposure through food was predominant for both PFOA and PFOS (Table 4). Among the estimates, exposure via food consumption was the major source, followed by tap water and indoor dust. Exposure via tap water was more intense in the Kansai region than in the Tohoku region. Information regarding exposure levels via indoor dust and food is still insufficient. Moreover, exposure levels to precursors of PFOA and PFOS have not been evaluated. Even if these estimates for PFOA and PFOS exposure are uncertain, they play important roles in allowing speculation for sources of exposure that may lead to regional differences in serum levels.

Table 4 Estimates of adult exposures (ng/day) to PFOA and PFOS
Full size table

Compared with intakes of these compounds, analyses of 24-h pooled urine from residents in Kyoto revealed levels of 17.6 and 13.3 ng/day for PFOA and PFOS, respectively [49]. Although fecal excretion of these chemicals remains unclear, such limited excretion in urine was in clear contrast to the case for rodents and monkeys [49], suggesting unique pharmacokinetic behaviors in humans.

Serum levels of PFOA and PFOS in Japanese

Figure 1 shows the serum concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in Japanese [50]. There were significant geographical differences in PFOA and PFOS serum concentrations for both males and females. Residents belonging to the Kansai region (Kyoto, Osaka, and Hyogo) exhibited significantly higher serum PFOA levels. Serum PFOS levels in the Kansai region were significantly higher than those in the Tohoku and Chubu regions (Akita, Miyagi, Gifu, and Fukui) and comparable to those in Yamaguchi, Kochi, and Okinawa. The serum PFOS and PFOA levels in other countries are shown in Fig. 1. The serum PFOS levels were higher in the USA than in Japan and Europe, while the serum PFOA levels were comparable among the USA, Europe, and Japan, except for the Kansai region [19, 51, 52].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Human serum concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in Japan and several other countries collected from 2000 to 2005. The data for Tsukuba, Yokohama, and other sites in Japan are taken from Taniyasu et al. [20] and Harada et al. [18, 50]. The data are geometric means and geometric standard errors in Japan. For the USA and Sweden, the data are geometric means reported by Olsen et al. [19] and Kärrman et al. [52], respectively. For Germany, the data are medians reported by Fromme et al. [51]

Full size image

Several factors influencing the serum levels of these compounds have been reported. Sex-related differences in the serum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were observed and the concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were higher in males than in females [49, 51, 52]. There were positive correlations between age and PFOS and PFOA levels only in females [49]. Multiparous women had lower PFOS and PFOA levels than nulliparous women [10]. With regard to ethnicities, Mexican Americans had lower levels than non-Hispanic blacks and whites in the USA. Higher education was associated with higher PFOS and PFOA levels [53].

Time trends of the serum levels of these compounds have been presented by several researchers (Fig. 2). Harada et al. [18] revealed that the serum concentrations increased 3-fold for PFOS and 14-fold for PFOA between 1977 and 2003 in Yokote in Miyagi prefecture. The PFOA concentrations in Kyoto increased by 4.4-fold from 1983 to 1999 [50]. In the USA, the PFOS and PFOA concentrations increased between 1974 and 1989, and reached plateau levels in 1989 [54]. In China, the serum levels of both PFOA and PFOS have increased significantly over recent years and reached the corresponding levels in Japan [55]. After 3M Company phased out PFOA and PFOS production, decreases in the PFOA and PFOS concentrations were observed in the USA [56]. It should be confirmed whether similar decreases also have been observed in other countries.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Time trends in PFOA and PFOS serum levels in Japan [18, 50] and the USA [54]. Data are geometric means and geometric standard errors

Full size image

Toxicokinetics of PFOA and PFOS

A recent study revealed interspecies differences in the pharmacokinetics of PFOA and PFOS. The mean serum half-lives of PFOA and PFOS in humans were 3.5 and 5.4 years, respectively [57]. These long half-lives explain why PFOA and PFOS tend to accumulate in humans. In contrast, the half-lives in experimental animals were orders of magnitudes shorter than those in humans. The serum half-lives of PFOA in Wistar rats were reported to be 5.68 days for males and 0.08 days for females [58], whereas those in primates were 5.6 days for males and 2.7 days for females in Japanese macaques, and approximately 1 month for both sexes in cynomolgus monkeys [59, 60]. The serum half-lives of PFOS were longer than those of PFOA, comprising more than 89 days in male CR:CD rats [61], and approximately 100 days in both male and female cynomolgus monkeys [62].

In Cr:CD rats, intravenously administered PFOA and PFOS were excreted via the urine (67 and 18%, respectively) and feces (4.4 and 8.0%, respectively) [63, 64]. However, the serum clearances of PFOA via urine in humans were 300–1,000-fold lower than those in Wistar rats and Japanese macaques (Table 5) [49]. A critical role of the resorption process was supposed as a determinant for the large species differences in renal excretion of PFOA [65]. Several organic anion transporters (OATs) have been investigated. Nakagawa et al. [66] found that OAT1 (Slc22a6) and OAT3 (Slc22a8) mediated transport of PFOA in both humans and rats, while OAT2 (Slc22a7) did not. Rat Oatp1 (Slc21a1) had transport activity for PFOA, which may be involved in the resorption process and cause sex-related differences in rats, although no human ortholog for rat Oatp1 exists [67]. There have been few studies regarding the species difference in urinary excretion of these compounds, and further studies are warranted in this area.

Table 5 Estimated clearances of PFOA and PFOS in rats, monkeys, and humans
Full size table

Biliary excretion of PFOA and PFOS has emerged as a major elimination route in humans owing to the poor urinary excretion. PFOA and PFOS were detected in human bile samples at similarly high levels to those detected in serum samples [68]. The ratio of PFOS concentrations (bile/serum: 0.60) was significantly higher than that for PFOA concentrations (bile/serum: 0.21). The biliary excretion rates of PFOA and PFOS in humans were estimated to be 1.06 and 2.98 ml/(kg day), respectively (Table 5). Although elimination of PFOA and PFOS in feces remains unexplored, available evidence in rats suggests that trace amounts were excreted via this route owing to enterohepatic circulation of these chemicals [63]. Such enterohepatic circulation of PFOS and PFOA may account for their long half-lives in humans.

PFOS and PFOA have been detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in humans [68]. The PFOA and PFOS levels in CSF were approximately 1% of the corresponding levels in serum, suggesting that PFOA and PFOS cannot freely pass through the blood–brain barrier. The reported brain-to-blood ratios of 0.17 for PFOA and 0.26 for PFOS in cadavers were consistent with low partition to CSF [69]. However, the occurrence of these chemicals in CSF raises concerns that the central nervous system may be one of the target organs of PFOA and PFOS toxicities.

Sex-related differences in elimination

The sex-related differences in the renal clearances of PFOA in rats suggest that hormone-regulated elimination is probably involved to a certain extent in this species [58]. The expressions of OATs are known to be regulated by sex steroids and/or growth hormones in rodents, but not in humans [70].

Sex-related differences in the serum levels of these compounds were reported in humans, but there was no difference in renal clearance between males and females [49]. The observed difference may be explained by female-specific excretion routes, such as menstrual blood loss, lactation, and direct maternal-fetal transfer. Menopausal females had significantly higher serum concentrations than menstrual females in a 20–50-year age group [49]. With regard to excretion through lactation, PFOS and PFOA were detected in breast milk samples [71]. The mean ratios between the milk and serum concentrations were 0.01:1 for PFOS and 0.02:1 for PFOA, resulting in clearances of 6–12 ml/day. Decreases in the concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were reported between the first and second trimesters [8]. Several researchers have reported the concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in maternal and fetal cord serum samples [72]. In addition, PFOS and PFOA concentrations decreased with increased parity of mothers [10], implying that maternal-fetal transfer may reduce the maternal stores. Moreover, it is possible that hormonal changes in body composition or alterations of protein-binding affinity may affect the distribution and elimination of PFOS and PFOA [73, 74].

Toxicology of PFOA and PFOS

Epidemiological studies

There have been a number of reports on the health effects of PFOA and PFOS (Table 6). One epidemiological study conducted by 3M Company suggested an increase in prostate cancer mortality among workers exposed to PFOA [11]. Another study conducted by 3M Company revealed an increased mortality from bladder cancer among workers exposed to PFOS [9]. Hepatic, lipid, and thyroid parameters, which are known toxicological effects in rodents, showed inconsistent associations with serum levels of PFOS and PFOA in fluorochemical workers [75–77]. Besides hepatotoxicity, higher prevalences of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases were reported in plaintiffs or potential plaintiffs in a lawsuit, which might be biased [78]. Two epidemiological studies in the USA and Denmark showed an inverse correlation between PFC concentrations (cord or maternal blood) and birth weight [8, 10]. In the populations examined in these studies, the PFC levels were much lower than those in animal experiments, which may suggest species differences in susceptibility to PFCs.

Table 6 Epidemiology and in vivo toxicities of PFOA and PFOS
Full size table

Hepatotoxicity and molecular targets of PFOA and PFOS

Although these chemicals were found to be carcinogens for rodents [79, 80], they were not genotoxic in umu tests [81]. It should be further investigated whether the hepatocarcinogenic potencies are in proportion to the degrees of induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα), to which these chemicals bind as ligands [82]. In PPARα-null mice, hepatomegaly induced by PFOA was still observed, suggesting that another mode of action exists [83], such as constitutive activated/androstane receptor actions [84].

The expression and activation of PPARα differ between humans and rodents. In monkeys, PFOA and PFOS caused hepatomegaly, but did not lead to peroxisome proliferation [85, 86]. Therefore, results generated in rodents cannot be simply extrapolated to humans. In addition, a number of studies have revealed that the toxicological target organs of PFOS and PFOA may differ between humans and rodents, such as developmental toxicities in humans and carcinogenicity and liver toxicity in rodents.

Developmental toxicity

The reproductive and developmental toxicities of these chemicals toward humans are of particular concern [87]. Prenatal as well as postnatal toxicities of PFOA and PFOS were observed in rats and mice, including increased liver weights, growth lags, delayed development, and suppressed immune functions [88–90]. PFOA had significant effects on fetal growth and development in males, but much lesser effects in females. The difference in sensitivity was presumed to be due to the sex-related difference in PFOA elimination. Some developmental toxicities of PFOA, such as delayed eye opening and deficits in postnatal weight gain, were diminished in PPARα-null mice [91], whereas PFOS-induced neonatal lethality and delayed eye opening are not dependent on PPARα [92].

Neurotoxicity

PFOS may have effects on the neuroendocrine system in rats and mice. Increased corticosterone concentrations in serum and norepinephrine in the hypothalamus were induced by PFOS in mice, indicating that PFOS stimulates the stress axis [93]. Observed decreases in food intake caused by PFOA and PFOS were mediated via the activation of hypothalamic urocortin 1 and 2, respectively [94, 95]. PFOS exposure also induced behavioral effects in mice, such as anxiety and spatial memory loss [96]. These observations suggested neurotoxic effects of PFOA and PFOS, although the target molecules in the central nervous system remain unclear.

PFOS and PFOA were reported to exhibit electrophysiological effects on action potentials and currents in isolated guinea-pig ventricular myocytes, cerebellar Purkinje cells, and protozoa [97–99]. In addition to excitable cells, PFOS activated voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs) and increased intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in non-excitable tracheal cells [100]. PFOS also inhibited neurite growth and suppressed synaptogenesis in cultured hippocampal neurons through VDCCs [101]. The mechanisms of these effects are hypothesized to involve incorporation of PFOS and PFOA into the outer cell membrane, which would decrease the steepness of the transmembrane potential gradient and result in hyperpolarizing shifts of both the activation and inactivation of voltage-gated ionic channels.

Conclusions

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and related compounds have been used for many applications. The chemical stability of perfluorinated alkyl chains results in their persistence in the environment and organisms.

These compounds have been detected in various areas of Japan. In the Kansai region, environmental contamination by PFOA and related compounds was more intense than in other regions. Serum PFOA levels have been increasing insidiously throughout the last 20 years in Kyoto residents, and also in northern Japan. The geographic heterogeneity in the exposure intensities of PFOS and PFOA is likely, at least in part, to be associated with industrial activities. Although the estimated daily intakes of PFOS and PFOA remain somewhat uncertain, intake from drinking water is considered to represent a major component and could explain the regional differences in Japan. If this is indeed the case, identification of the sources and appropriate control of the release of PFCs urgently require discussion.

There are large interspecies differences in the toxicokinetics of these compounds. In particular, their poor renal clearances and long half-lives in humans suggest uncertainty regarding exposure assessment and extrapolation of test dosages. These qualitative differences may involve transporters in various organs.

The toxicological susceptibilities of humans to PFCs may also be higher than those of rodents. Epidemiological studies on birth weight in the general population revealed inverse correlations with PFOA and PFOS levels, which were 100–1,000-fold less than those in animal experiments. Although human PPARα has relatively low activity in comparison to rodent PPARα, other molecular targets of PFOS and PFOA may exist.

PFOA and PFOS are now under control and regulation in various countries. Monitoring of these compounds should be continued to evaluate measurements of PFCs. In closing, there are growing concerns regarding the developmental toxicities of these compounds toward human fetuses, particularly in the Kansai region. Further studies regarding the issue of whether adverse developmental effects occur are urgently required.

References

  1. Kissa E. Fluorinated surfactants and repellents. 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hogue C. Government & policy—perfluorinated pollutant puzzle. Chem Engl News. 2004;82:17–19,59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prevedouros K, Cousins IT, Buck RC, Korzeniowski SH. Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:32–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. UNEP, 2007. POPRC3: development of risk management evaluation. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.3/20. http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/Repository/poprc3/UNEP-POPS-POPRC.3-POPRC-3-5.English.PDF.

  5. Wood A, Clarin W. 3M to phase out PFOS. Chem Week. 2000;162:9–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kannan K, Koistinen J, Beckmen K, Evans T, Gorzelany JF, Hansen KJ, et al. Accumulation of perfluorooctane sulfonate in marine mammals. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:1593–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen KJ, Clemen LA, Ellefson ME, Johnson HO. Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:766–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fei CY, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Olsen J. Perfluorinated chemicals and fetal growth: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1677–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander BH, Olsen GW, Burris JM, Mandel JH, Mandel JS. Mortality of employees of a perfluorooctanesulphonyl fluoride manufacturing facility. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:722–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Apelberg BJ, Witter FR, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Halden RU, Needham LL, et al. Cord serum concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in relation to weight and size at birth. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1670–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilliland FD, Mandel JS. Mortality among employees of a perfluorooctanoic acid production plant. J Occup Med. 1993;35:950–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. USEPA. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, proposed significant new use rule. Federal Register. 2006;71:12311–24.

  13. Canada. Order Adding Toxic Substances to Schedule 1 to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Canada Gazette Part II. 2006;140:2147–53.

  14. European Commission. Directive 2006/122/EC amending for Directive 76/769/EEC. Off J Eur Commun 2006;L 372/32, 27 December 2006.

  15. USEPA, Risk profile on perfluorooctane sulfonate. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.2/17/Add.5 http://www.pops.int/documents/meetings/poprc_2/meeting_docs/report/default.htm.

  16. Harada K, Saito N, Sasaki K, Inoue K, Koizumi A. Perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination of drinking water in the Tama River, Japan: estimated effects on resident serum levels. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;71:31–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito N, Harada K, Inoue K, Sasaki K, Yoshinaga T, Koizumi A. Perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate concentrations in surface water in Japan. J Occup Health. 2004;46:49–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harada K, Saito N, Inoue K, Yoshinaga T, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, et al. The influence of time, sex and geographic factors on levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in human serum over the last 25 years. J Occup Health. 2004;46:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsen GW, Church TR, Miller JP, Burris JM, Hansen KJ, Lundberg JK, et al. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and other fluorochemicals in the serum of American Red Cross adult blood donors. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1892–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taniyasu S, Kannan K, Horii Y, Hanari N, Yamashita N. A survey of perfluorooctane sulfonate and related perfluorinated organic compounds in water, fish, birds, and humans from Japan. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:2634–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen PHL, Fujii S, Tanaka S, Nozoe M, Tanaka H. Contamination of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in surface water of the Yodo River basin (Japan). Desalination. 2008;226:338–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zushi Y, Takeda T, Masunaga S. Existence of nonpoint source of perfluorinated compounds and their loads in the Tsurumi River basin, Japan. Chemosphere. 2008;71:1566–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamashita N, Kannan K, Taniyasu S, Horii Y, Okazawa T, Petrick G, et al. Analysis of perfluorinated acids at parts-per-quadrillion levels in seawater using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:5522–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen KJ, Johnson HO, Eldridge JS, Butenhoff JL, Dick LA. Quantitative characterization of trace levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Tennessee River. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:1681–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moody CA, Martin JW, Kwan WC, Muir DC, Mabury SA. Monitoring perfluorinated surfactants in biota and surface water samples following an accidental release of fire-fighting foam into Etobicoke Creek. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:545–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakayama S, Strynar MJ, Helfant L, Egeghy P, Ye X, Lindstrom AB. Perfluorinated compounds in the Cape Fear Drainage Basin in North Carolina. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:5271–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Skutlarek D, Exner M, Farber H. Perfluorinated surfactants in surface and drinking water. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2006;13:299–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Osaka Prefecture, Monitoring of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate in river. 2007. http://www.epcc.pref.osaka.jp/press/h19/0831_2/.

  29. Mitsuya R, Sometani A, Hosoda N, Matsuzaki T, Ohara K. A survey of PFOS and PFOA and its removal during water treatment. Abstracts of 58th annual meeting of Japan Water Works Association. 2007; 554–5.

  30. Harada K, Nakanishi S, Saito N, Tsutsui T, Koizumi A. Airborne perfluorooctanoate may be a substantial source contamination in Kyoto area, Japan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005;74:64–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harada K, Nakanishi S, Sasaki K, Furuyama K, Nakayama S, Saito N, et al. Particle size distribution and respiratory deposition estimates of airborne perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctanesulfonate in Kyoto area, Japan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2006;76:306–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sasaki K, Harada K, Saito N, Tsutsui T, Nakanishi S, Tsuzuki H, et al. Impact of airborne perfluorooctane sulfonate on the human body burden and the ecological system. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;71:408–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ministry of Environment, Chemicals in the Environment FY2004, 2006. http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/kurohon/2005/http2005d/d_section02_01.html.

  34. Boulanger B, Peck AM, Schnoor JL, Hornbuckle KC. Mass budget of perfluorooctane surfactants in Lake Ontario. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:74–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Barber JL, Berger U, Chaemfa C, Huber S, Jahnke A, Temme C, et al. Analysis of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances in air samples from Northwest Europe. J Environ Monit. 2007;9:530–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Katsumata T, Nakata A, Iwasaki Y, Ito R, Saito K, Nakazawa H. Determination of perfluorochemicals in house-dust by LC/MS/MS after supercritical fluid extraction. Bunseki Kagaku. 2006;55:955–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moriwaki H, Takatah Y, Arakawa R. Concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in vacuum cleaner dust collected in Japanese homes. J Environ Monit. 2003;5:753–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Strynar MJ, Lindstrom AB. Perfluorinated compounds in house dust from Ohio and North Carolina, USA. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:3751–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dinglasan-Panlilio MJ, Mabury SA. Significant residual fluorinated alcohols present in various fluorinated materials. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:1447–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellis DA, Martin JW, Mabury SA, Hurley MD, Andersen MPS, Wallington TJ. Atmospheric lifetime of fluorotelomer alcohols. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:3816–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Oono S, Harada KH, Mahmoud M, Inoue K, Koizumi A. Survey of airborne polyfluorinated telomers in Japan. Chemosphere. 2008;73:932–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Oono S, Matsubara E, Harada KH, Takagi S, Hamada S, Asakawa A, et al. Survey of airborne polyfluorinated telomers in Keihan area, Japan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;80:102–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fromme H, Schlummer M, Moller A, Gruber L, Wolz G, Ungewiss J, et al. Exposure of an adult population to perfluorinated substances using duplicate diet portions and biomonitoring data. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:7928–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tittlemier SA, Pepper K, Seymour C, Moisey J, Bronson R, Cao XL, et al. Dietary exposure of Canadians to perfluorinated carboxylates and perfluorooctane sulfonate via consumption of meat, fish, fast foods, and food items prepared in their packaging. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:3203–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Karrman A, Harada KH, Inoue K, Takasuga T, Ohi E, Koizumi A. Analysis of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in diet duplicates and serum from Japan. DIOXIN 2007, Tokyo, Japan.

  46. Falandysz J, Taniyasu S, Gulkowska A, Yamashita N, Schulte-Oehlmann U. Is fish a major source of fluorinated surfactants and repellents in humans living on the Baltic Coast? Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:748–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Begley TH, White K, Honigfort P, Twaroski ML, Neches R, Walker RA. Perfluorochemicals: potential sources of and migration from food packaging. Food Addit Contam. 2005;22:1023–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Aung NN, Yoshinaga J, Takahashi J-I. Exposure Assessment of Lead among Japanese Children. Environ Health Prev Med. 2004;9:257–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Harada K, Inoue K, Morikawa A, Yoshinaga T, Saito N, Koizumi A. Renal clearance of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in humans and their species-specific excretion. Environ Res. 2005;99:253–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Harada K, Koizumi A, Saito N, Inoue K, Yoshinaga T, Date C, et al. Historical and geographical aspects of the increasing perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination in human serum in Japan. Chemosphere. 2007;66:293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fromme H, Midasch O, Twardella D, Angerer J, Boehmer S, Liebl B. Occurrence of perfluorinated substances in an adult German population in southern Bavaria. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007;80:313–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kärrman A, Mueller JF, van Bavel B, Harden F, Toms LM, Lindstrom G. Levels of 12 perfluorinated chemicals in pooled australian serum, collected 2002–2003, in relation to age, gender, and region. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:3742–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Caudill SP, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Perfluorochemicals in pooled serum samples from USA residents in 2001 and 2002. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:2128–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Olsen GW, Huang HY, Helzlsouer KJ, Hansen KJ, Butenhoff JL, Mandel JH. Historical comparison of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorooctanoate, and other fluorochemicals in human blood. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:539–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jin Y, Saito N, Harada KH, Inoue K, Koizumi A. Historical trends in human serum levels of perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate in Shenyang, China. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;212:63–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Olsen GW, Mair DC, Reagen WK, Ellefson ME, Ehresman DJ, Butenhoff JL, et al. Preliminary evidence of a decline in perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations in American Red Cross Blood Donors. Chemosphere. 2007;68:105–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Ehresman DJ, Froehlich JW, Seacat AM, Butenhoff JL, et al. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1298–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kudo N, Katakura M, Sato Y, Kawashima Y. Sex hormone-regulated renal transport of perfluorooctanoic acid. Chem Biol Interact. 2002;139:301–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kudo N, Kawashima Y, The study of excretion pathway and long-term persistency of fluorinated fatty acids in primates. In: Annual reports of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Aichi, Vol. 31;2001

  60. Butenhoff JL, Kennedy GL Jr, Hinderliter PM, Lieder PH, Jung R, Hansen KJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of perfluorooctanoate in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol Sci. 2004;82:394–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gibson SJ, Johnson JD, Absorption of FC–95-14C in rats after a single oral dose. Riker Laboratories, Inc., Subsidiary of 3 M, St. Paul, MN, USEPA Public Docket AR-226-0007.1979.

  62. Noker PE, Gorman GS. A pharmacokinetic study of potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate in the Cynomolgus monkey. USEPA public docket, administrative record AR-226-1356. 2003.

  63. Johnson JD, Gibson SJ, Ober RE. Cholestyramine-enhanced fecal elimination of carbon-14 in rats after administration of ammonium [14C]perfluorooctanoate or potassium [14C]perfluorooctanesulfonate. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1984;4:972–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Vanden Heuvel JP, Kuslikis BI, Van Rafelghem MJ, Peterson RE. Tissue distribution, metabolism, and elimination of perfluorooctanoic acid in male and female rats. J Biochem Toxicol. 1991;6:83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Andersen ME, Clewell HJ 3rd, Tan YM, Butenhoff JL, Olsen GW. Pharmacokinetic modeling of saturable, renal resorption of perfluoroalkylacids in monkeys—probing the determinants of long plasma half-lives. Toxicology. 2006;227:156–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Nakagawa H, Hirata T, Terada T, Jutabha P, Miura D, Harada KH, et al. Roles of organic anion transporters in the renal excretion of perfluorooctanoic acid. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;103:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Katakura M, Kudo N, Tsuda T, Hibino Y, Mitsumoto A, Kawashima Y. Rat organic anion transporter 3 and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1 mediate perfluorooctanoic acid transport. J Health Sci. 2007;53:77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Harada KH, Hashida S, Kaneko T, Takenaka K, Minata M, Inoue K, et al. Biliary excretion and cerebrospinal fluid partition of perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate in humans. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;24:134–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Maestri L, Negri S, Ferrari M, Ghittori S, Fabris F, Danesino P, et al. Determination of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonate in human tissues by liquid chromatography/single quadrupole mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20:2728–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Buist SC, Cherrington NJ, Choudhuri S, Hartley DP, Klaassen CD. Gender-specific and developmental influences on the expression of rat organic anion transporters. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;301:145–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Karrman A, Ericson I, van Bavel B, Darnerud PO, Aune M, Glynn A, et al. Exposure of perfluorinated chemicals through lactation: levels of matched human milk and serum and a temporal trend, 1996–2004, in Sweden. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Inoue K, Okada F, Ito R, Kato S, Sasaki S, Nakajima S, et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and related perfluorinated compounds in human maternal and cord blood samples: assessment of PFOS exposure in a susceptible population during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1204–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Han X, Snow TA, Kemper RA, Jepson GW. Binding of perfluorooctanoic acid to rat and human plasma proteins. Chem Res Toxicol. 2003;16:775–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Jones PD, Hu W, De Coen W, Newsted JL, Giesy JP. Binding of perfluorinated fatty acids to serum proteins. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003;22:2639–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Burlew MM, Mandel JH. Epidemiologic assessment of worker serum perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations and medical surveillance examinations. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:260–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Mandel JH, Zobel LR. Serum perfluorooctane sulfonate and hepatic and lipid clinical chemistry tests in fluorochemical production employees. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Sakr CJ, Kreckmann KH, Green JW, Gillies PJ, Reynolds JL, Leonard RC. Cross-sectional study of lipids and liver enzymes related to a serum biomarker of exposure (ammonium perfluorooctanoate or APFO) as part of a general health survey in a cohort of occupationally exposed workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:1086–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Anderson-Mahoney P, Kotlerman J, Takhar H, Gray D, Dahlgren J. Self-reported health effects among community residents exposed to perfluorooctanoate. New Solut. 2008;18:129–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Abdellatif AG, Preat V, Taper HS, Roberfroid M. The modulation of rat liver carcinogenesis by perfluorooctanoic acid, a peroxisome proliferator. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991;111:530–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Seacat AM, Thomford PJ, Butenhoff JL. Terminal observations in Sprague Dawley rats after lifetime dietary exposure to potassium perfluorooclanesulfonate. Toxicologist. 2002;66:185.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Oda Y, Nakayama S, Harada KH, Koizumi A. Negative results of umu mutagenecity test of fluorotelomer alcohols and perfluorinated alkyl acids. Environ Health Prev Med. 2007;12:217–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Vanden Heuvel JP, Thompson JT, Frame SR, Gillies PJ. Differential activation of nuclear receptors by perfluorinated fatty acid analogs and natural fatty acids: a comparison of human, mouse, and rat peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, -beta, and -gamma, liver X receptor-beta, and retinoid X receptor-alpha. Toxicol Sci. 2006;92:476–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wolf DC, Moore T, Abbott BD, Rosen MB, Das KP, Zehr RD, et al. Comparative hepatic effects of perfluorooctanoic acid and WY 14, 643 in PPAR-alpha knockout and wild-type mice. Toxicol Pathol. 2008;36:632–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Rosen MB, Lee JS, Ren H, Vallanat B, Liu J, Waalkes MP, et al. Toxicogenomic dissection of the perfluorooctanoic acid transcript profile in mouse liver: evidence for the involvement of nuclear receptors PPAR alpha and CAR. Toxicol Sci. 2008;103:46–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Butenhoff J, Costa G, Elcombe C, Farrar D, Hansen K, Iwai H, et al. Toxicity of ammonium perfluorooctanoate in male cynomolgus monkeys after oral dosing for 6 months. Toxicol Sci. 2002;69:244–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Seacat AM, Thomford PJ, Hansen KJ, Olsen GW, Case MT, Butenhoff JL. Subchronic toxicity studies on perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol Sci. 2002;68:249–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Lau C, Butenhoff JL, Rogers JM. The developmental toxicity of perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:231–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lau C, Thibodeaux JR, Hanson RG, Rogers JM, Grey BE, Stanton ME, et al. Exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonate during pregnancy in rat and mouse. II: postnatal evaluation. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74:382–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Thibodeaux J, Hanson RG, Grey BE, Barbee BD, Richards JH, Butenhoff JL, et al. Maternal and developmental toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the mouse. Toxicol Sci. 2003;72:342.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Keil DE, Mehlmann T, Butterworth L, Peden-Adams MM. Gestational exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonate suppresses immune function in B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Sci. 2008;103:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Abbott BD, Wolf CJ, Schmid JE, Das KP, Zehr RD, Helfant L, et al. Perfluorooctanoic acid-induced developmental toxicity in the mouse is dependent on expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Toxicol Sci. 2007;98:571–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Abbott BD, Wolf CJ, Das KP, Zehr RD, Schmid JE, Lindstrom AB, et al. Developmental toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is not dependent on expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) in the mouse. Reprod Toxicol. 2008.

  93. Austin ME, Kasturi BS, Barber M, Kannan K, MohanKumar PS, MohanKumar SM. Neuroendocrine effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate in rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1485–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Asakawa A, Toyoshima M, Fujimiya M, Harada K, Ataka K, Inoue K, et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonate influences feeding behavior and gut motility via the hypothalamus. Int J Mol Med. 2007;19:733–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Asakawa A, Toyoshima M, Harada KH, Fujimiya M, Inoue K, Koizumi A. The ubiquitous environmental pollutant perfluorooctanoic acid inhibits feeding behavior via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Int J Mol Med. 2008;21:439–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Fuentes S, Vicens P, Colomina MT, Domingo JL. Behavioral effects in adult mice exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). Toxicology. 2007;242:123–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Harada K, Xu F, Ono K, Iijima T, Koizumi A. Effects of PFOS and PFOA on L-type Ca2+ currents in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:487–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Harada KH, Ishii TM, Takatsuka K, Koizumi A, Ohmori H. Effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate on action potentials and currents in cultured rat cerebellar Purkinje cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;351:240–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Matsubara E, Harada K, Inoue K, Koizumi A. Effects of perfluorinated amphiphiles on backward swimming in Paramecium caudatum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;339:554–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Matsubara E, Nakahari T, Yoshida H, Kuroiwa T, Harada KH, Inoue K, et al. Effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate on tracheal ciliary beating frequency in mice. Toxicology. 2007;236:190–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Liao CY, Li XY, Wu B, Duan S, Jiang GB. Acute enhancement of synaptic transmission and chronic inhibition of synaptogenesis induced by perluorooctane sulfonate through mediation of voltage-dependent calcium channel. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5335–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17-1910 and 19890107 to K.H.H.) and a grant-in-aid for Health Science Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (H15-Chemistry-004 to A.K.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida Konoe, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Kouji H. Harada & Akio Koizumi

Authors
  1. Kouji H. Harada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akio Koizumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kouji H. Harada.

Additional information

This article is based on research that received an encouragement award at the 78th annual meeting of the Japanese Society for Hygiene held in Kumamoto, Japan, on 28–31 March 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harada, K.H., Koizumi, A. Environmental and biological monitoring of persistent fluorinated compounds in Japan and their toxicities. Environ Health Prev Med 14, 7–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-008-0058-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-008-0058-5

Keywords

Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

ISSN: 1347-4715

Contact us