Skip to main content

Lifestyle interventions in the maritime settings: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Evidence on workplace health promotion interventions at sea is scattered and includes different methodological approaches. The continued focus on lifestyle and health promotion on land-based industries makes it pertinent to evaluate available data from maritime settings to gain systematic knowledge on the field.

Methods

In this systematic review, we systematically searched PubMed and NLM Gateway (for MEDLINE), Institute of Scientific Information/Web of Science (ISI/WOS), and SCOPUS up to January 2019 using standard keywords including lifestyle interventions in the maritime setting. Two independent reviewers assessed papers and extracted the data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to significant heterogeneity between studies, the effectiveness of interventions was presented as a qualitative synthesis.

Results

After the initial search and refinement based on a total of 4432 records, ten articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. Six studies originated from US maritime settings, 3 studies were conducted on Danish seafarers and one study came from Finland. The main focus of 6 studies was educational interventions including stress management, healthy eating, anti-smoking and anti-drinking sessions, sexual behavior program, and advice about preventive strategies. Four studies described the implementation of interventions, including micro-nutrient supplementation, physical activity, and pharmacotherapy. Follow-up assessments occurred over a time period ranging from 80 days to 2 years. Three studies found a positive though limited effect of structural and/or education interventions in maritime settings. The quality of all included studies was modest.

Conclusion

Results of this systematic review show that a limited number of studies of lifestyle interventions in the maritime setting exist and that the quality of them is generally modest. Also, most of the interventions identified have failed to demonstrate substantial health benefits for seafarers.

Systematic review registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42019134533

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in seafarers [1]. A study conducted among Danish seafarers revealed that cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, high blood pressure, and increased levels of triglycerides are highly prevalent [2]. Likewise, a study among Iranian seafarers showed that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and excess weight was 15% and 51%, respectively [3]. Moreover, the prevalence of behavioral risk factors like smoking and physical inactivity in seafarers is high [2,3,4]. Ship-specific stress situations, lack of sufficient and appropriate exercise, and malnutrition have been described as the main risk factors for CVD in the maritime setting [1]. An unhealthy lifestyle may have different consequences such as ill-health, absence due to sickness and loss of productivity [5]. Worksites—even in land-based occupations—represent a major venue for influencing the overall health of workers [6]. Since seafarers often for several months have a second home on board ships, unhealthy lifestyle together with specific working conditions may in such a microcosmos form a hazardous environment not only affecting the health and wellbeing of the seafarer but also potentially affecting the economy and safety of the ship. So, it is important to target the health behavior of seafarers on board as a method for future prevention programs.

The present paper summarizes and evaluates existing interventions targeting the health and wellbeing of seafarers. It is expected that this study will provide relevant input for health policymakers in this maritime population to develop health promotion strategies and can inspire other researchers to fill the gap of the presently limited quality research in the field of health promotion at sea.

Methods

Identification of relevant studies

This systematic review was carried out to identify and assess all evidence on the lifestyle interventions in seafarers. The PRISMA-P guideline was used to develop the current systematic review (Fig. 1) [7], the items for meta-analysis were not applicable for this review. All the documents are based on the details of the study protocol. The registration number of our study in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) is CRD42019134533.

Fig. 1
figure1

PRISMA 2009 flow diagram

The search terms developed concentrating on two main roots of “seafarers” and “health interventions”. There was no limitation for language and time of papers. All studies carried out until the end of January 2019 were considered in this systematic review. For documents other than English, the necessary arrangements were taken for their translation. To assess the optimal sensitivity of searching for documents, we simultaneously searched the most comprehensive related databases of PubMed and NLM Gateway (for MEDLINE), Institute of Scientific Information, Web of Science (ISI/WOS), and SCOPUS as the main international electronic data sources (Appendix 1). Moreover, some reference lists of included studies or relevant reviews through the search were scanned to identify potentially eligible studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To obtain a comprehensive overview of the works that have been done so far, we focused on all studies published up to January 2019—on the lifestyle changes including type and quality of food, vitamin/mineral supplementation, physical activity, and educational programs, etc. Studies with outcomes such as smoking, stress level, physical activity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, behavior change, and other outcomes complying with the objective of the study in the target group were included. Also, we included all observational studies. All relevant results were extracted from randomized control trials, quasi-experimental studies, and non-randomizes studies. There was no limitation for the target groups in terms of age and gender and language of published studies. Duplicate citations and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Book chapters and available conference proceedings were also considered.

Quality assessment and data extraction

All systematic processes of literature searches, quality assessment, and data extraction of eligible papers were conducted by two independent research experts and any discrepancy between them was resolved through referencing a third expert opinion.

We investigated the quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane Back Review Risk of Bias criteria [8]. The criteria list consists of 11-items evaluating internal validity. We also used The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies) to assess the quality of quasi-experimental (before–after) studies [9]. This checklist has 9 items and the total score was the number of positive items (range 0–9 scores).

Two independent investigators scored items as positive when they met the criteria, negative if they did not, or as inconclusive if there was insufficient information.

The extracted data included: author and year of publication, population characteristics (mean age/age range and subjects), methodological characteristics (study design, period of the study, sample size, type of ship or shipping sector, type of interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement).

Data synthesis was the main strategy. The number of included studies was more than 4 studies but the heterogeneity of them in terms of the type of interventions, follow-up period, randomization, etc. hampered the possibility of a meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis

Due to heterogeneity between studies in terms of study design, type of intervention, study duration, and different outcome measurements, the results were presented as a qualitative synthesis.

Results

Study selection process

A total of 4432 studies were identified following the initial search. After the removal of 200 duplicates, 4232 records remained. A total of 4190 articles did not meet selection criteria, so they were excluded after screening titles and abstracts. Of the remaining 42 studies retrieved, 32 were excluded after the full-text review because the outcomes did not comply with the objectives of the current study (Fig. 1). Finally, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria in the review [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

Study characteristics

A summary of all included studies is shown in Table 1. Four studies were RCTs, three were non-randomized studies and three were quasi-experimental. The studies were done in three countries. Six studies were done in the US maritime setting, three were conducted among Danish seafarers, and one in Finland.

Table 1 Characteristic of the included studies

Main focus of 6 studies was educational interventions including stress management [13], healthy eating [14], anti-smoking and anti-drinking sessions [10, 11], sexual behavior program [15], and advice about preventive strategies [16]. Of these 6 studies, four were conducted on multi-component interventions [10, 11, 15, 16]. Practical interventions including micro-nutrient supplementation [17, 18], exercise test [19], and pharmacotherapy [12] were implemented in the four studies.

Only one study done on seafarers with metabolic syndrome (MetS) was basically a treatment intervention [16]. The content of all the other 9 studies was based on prevention. Follow-up assessments occurred over a time period ranging from 80 days to 2 years with different time intervals. Three studies included more than one intervention. There were 2 studies including vitamin D supplementation to submariners [17, 18]. One study was a web-based educational program [13].

Qualitative synthesis

  • Dietary habits and factors

Five studies assessed multi- or single-component interventions to improve diet: preparing healthier food [11], avoiding overeating and high-sugar product intake [10], eating behavior on board [14], and maintenance of vitamin D status [17, 18].

After training for ship cooks in preparing healthier meals, the meals at the 1-year follow-up got healthier compared with baseline [11]. A significant decline was observed in the intake of high-sugar products, but no significant change was found in overeating habits 1 year after delivering healthy cooking courses for ship cooks [10]. In another 1-year follow-up study, a training intervention for ship cooks made a significant change in the self-reported eating behavior on board [14]. Two studies examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the maintenance of 25(OH)D serum levels in submariners [17, 18]. A 400-IU/day vitamin D supplementation was insufficient in maintaining serum vitamin D levels in underway submariners [18]. A significant benefit for the submariners supplemented with 1000 or 2000 IU/day vitamin D over the non-supplemented ones was not observed following a 3-month patrol, even though the submariners who were supplemented with 2000 IU/day of vitamin D3 did experience the largest positive change in mean serum 25(OH)D levels [17].

  • Physical activity

Three studies addressed physical activity outcomes measured as physical exercise level [10, 11], physical fitness score [10], and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) [19].

Mild [10] to moderate [11] improvement in exercise level and a significant increase in physical fitness scores [10] were noted after implementing both structural and education interventions at the maritime workplace. Following physical training and deconditioning, VO2max remained constant in the intervention group but had declined, though statistically insignificant, by 7% in the control group [19].

  • Cardio-metabolic risk factor

Five interventional studies addressed changes in cardio-metabolic risk factors including MetS, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) [10, 16], and weight and body fat (BF) as an outcome [19]. After the delivery of a multicomponent intervention, a significant decrease in the percentage of seafarers with MetS was measured [10]. In contrast, another study including general and specific advice regarding treatment or preventive strategies for MetS showed an increase in all outcomes such as BMI, WC, and the prevalence of MetS in the studied group at follow-up [16].

  • Smoking and alcohol habits

Five studies examined the effect of interventions on smoking [10,11,12, 16] or alcohol drinking habits [11, 15, 16].

In one of three studies that implemented only advice-based anti-smoking interventions, a reduction in the number of smokers was reported following a 1-year period [10, 11, 16]. In a RCT, where three various pharmacotherapies for smoking cessations were compared with a control group, no significant differences in smoking habits were detected between groups. In all four groups, nearly 70% of the smokers were still smoking at 6 and 12 months [12].

Among three studies that assessed change in alcohol drinking habits following educational intervention, two studies found no significant change [15, 16], whereas the third reported a reduction, but did neither provide any quantitative information about the decline nor any statistics [11].

  • Stress and work satisfaction

Two studies examined interventions aimed at reducing stress levels and both reported a positive outcome of the intervention [11, 13]. In the study that implemented a web-enhanced behavioral self-management program against stress, this reduction was statistically significant [13]. In another interventional study aimed at work satisfaction, an increment in this outcome after providing health education for the seafarers was observed [11].

  • Risky sexual behaviors

An intervention study showed few positive changes in the sexual behavior of the mariners after delivering a STD/HIV intervention program course [15].

Quality assessment

The results of the quality assessment are presented in Table 1. One out of four RCTs (25%) fulfilled six or more of the quality items; the scores ranged from 3/11 to 7/11, a moderate risk of bias. Lack of intervention allocation, concealment, and intention-to-treat analysis were identified in all RCTs. For six non-randomized studies, the quality scores ranged from 3/9 to 5/9; none of them met six or more of the quality items.

Discussion

Our review included ten intervention studies focused on changing lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes through structural and/or educational interventions in seafarers. Assessed outcomes were classified into six categories including dietary habits and factors, physical activity, cardio-metabolic risk factors, smoking and alcohol habits, stress and work satisfaction, and risky sexual behaviors. Some of the included studies reported a significant positive effect of implemented interventions, although the positive changes were limited.

Overall, the results of this systematic review showed that most of the intervention studies conducted on lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes at the maritime workplace were methodologically weak and were not well designed and conducted. However, as an overall assessment, the evidence tends to suggest that lifestyle interventions are feasible and may have the potential to improve health behaviors in this high-risk group of seafarers. For comparison, the first review on the behavioral lifestyle interventions for nurses also reported that all included studies had limitations and high risk of bias, but later found benefits for the outcomes including smoking habits, fat mass and physical fitness [20].

In this review, three studies found beneficial effects following educational and/or structural interventions focusing on the seafarers’ dietary behavior [10, 11, 14]. Two studies found multi-component physical activity interventions to be effective in increasing seafarers’ physical activity and/or fitness [10, 11]. Most interventions were non-effective regarding weight-related indicators. A review of 15 systematic reviews on land-based workplace interventions targeting diet and/or physical activity reported that almost all interventions made small but significant changes in physical activity, fitness, dietary behavior or weight, and found that intervention involving multi-component programs tended to be more successful [21].

A healthy diet during working time is less available at sea due to restricted space for storage and lack of proper equipment, high prices for fresh fruit and vegetables, and low frequency of supply options on board of the ships [14]. In other occupational settings, fruit and vegetable interventions are generally successful. For example, a worksite study conducted in Denmark resulted in an average increase of 1 serving of fruit and vegetables per day for each person [22]. A review study with the aim of identifying efforts to improve fruit and vegetable intake at workplace revealed that organizational support, workers participation, targeting multiple health behaviors are some factors which play a significant role in the success of such a program [23] which researchers should consider in order to enhance the effectiveness of interventions in maritime settings.

Seafarers are often sedentary on board; space and physical capacities on board are confined for the exercise during leisure time. Besides, technological advancements in modern vessels have removed much physical labor and caused more physical inactivity among seafarers [10].

Seafarers are frequently characterized in the literature as heavy smokers and drinkers [24]. In our systematic review, two out of 4 studies reported a small reduction in tobacco consumption [11, 12]. Results from a Cochrane review of interventions for smoking cessation at various workplaces provided strong evidence that group therapy programs, individual and group counseling, multiple intervention programs aimed mainly or solely at smoking cessation, and pharmacotherapies significantly increased the likelihood of quitting smoking [25]. However, in the case of the onboard setting, the physical environment, operational demands, and psychosocial issues may provide obstacles for a successful tobacco cessation program [12]. Therefore, a more specifically tailored approach is probably required, which takes into account specific conditions in the maritime settings.

Submariners experience a reduction in their serum vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels due to sunlight deprivation and may take advantage of vitamin D supplementation to maintain vitamin D status [17]. However, the results of two placebo-controlled studies failed to provide any robust support to the efficacy of daily vitamin D supplementation on the maintenance of serum vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels during a submarine patrol [17, 18]. Some potential confounders, such as subject compliance and insufficient prescribed dose of vitamin D may, however, have affected the findings.

One out of two intervention studies aimed at preventing or treating MetS detected a significant decrease in the percentage of seafarers with MetS [10]. Multi-dimension lifestyle interventions that target all risk factors for MetS should be implemented appropriately at the maritime settings to reduce the incidence as well as prevalence of MetS [10, 16].

A significant reduction is observed for stress levels after delivering a web-enhanced behavioral self-management program in a military setting [13]. In two other studies, the computer-based intervention was compared with in-person intervention for reducing stress in workers. One of them reported that stress levels were significantly lower in the in-person group after intervention in comparison to the computer-based intervention group [26]. In the other study, no significant difference between the two groups was observed [27]. The researchers suggest that further studies need to be done to compare the effect of equivalent computer-based program and in-person ones [28]. Despite the opposing findings, the computer-based interventions through specific features can be delivered to a large number of individuals at distance and in a cost-efficient manner [13] and might be a good approach for implementing interventions in maritime settings.

Limitations, challenges, and strengths

The included studies had multiple limitations including small sample size, short-term follow-up, lack of proper control groups or use of inappropriate control groups, inappropriate/insufficient interventions, high drop-out rates, partial implementation failure, and insufficient outcome measures.

Researchers face specific practical challenges related to the maritime workplace setting; it is hard to have a control group technically due to the “moving nature” of work at the maritime setting [10]. Crew members shift between ships regularly, thus making a fixed assignment of crews/ships to an intervention or control condition not feasible. Assignment of a whole area in the shipping industry instead of crews/ships to a study group should be considered.

High numbers of “lost to follow-up” is another serious challenge encountered by intervention studies that can result in selection bias; probably as a result of the “moving nature” of the maritime workplace and a higher between-ship mobility among seafarers [10, 12].

To the best of our knowledge, the current study was the first systematic review conducted on this topic, which can provide sufficient evidence for further health promotion studies in this setting.

Suggestions

Making successful lifestyle changes to promote health in a high-risk group such as seafarers seems to require multi-component interventions that well address the working and living conditions on board like psychosocial issues. Moreover, using health promotion theory or models which are fitted to this maritime setting would be useful to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions.

And very importantly, it is a necessary factor in implementing the interventions on board ships that the shipping companies actively participate in and support the interventions. The costs paid by companies for the health interventions need to be related to the expected improved health and working capacity of the seafarers and a reduced risk of human errors on board ship.

Conclusion

Most available studies of the feasibility and effectiveness of educational and/or structural interventions in the maritime workplace have failed to demonstrate substantial health benefits for seafarers. At present, it is not clear whether the apparently limited success of the interventions is a valid observation caused by insufficient statistical power or because the methodological quality of most interventions is generally poor. Both explanations are probably, at least in part, due to the fact that implementing interventions in the maritime workplace can be difficult and it is a challenging area for research. Studies with more rigorous designs are still needed which takes into account the specific restrictions inherent in the maritime workplace and find effective lifestyle interventions and quantify their effect on health and wellbeing and their sustainability on board.

Availability of data and materials

Since no dataset was generated during the current study, data sharing is not applicable.

Abbreviations

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

WOS:

Web of Science

RCTs:

Randomized Controlled Trials

MetS:

Metabolic Syndrome

BMI:

Body Mass Index

WC:

Waist Circumference

BF:

Body Fat

STD:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

NRS:

Non-Randomizes Study

QE:

Quasi-Experimental

NP:

Not Provided

NS:

Non-Significant

S:

Significant

References

  1. 1.

    Oldenburg M. Risk of cardiovascular diseases in seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2014;65(2):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    LA Hjarnoe L. A risky occupation? (Un)healthy lifestyle behaviors among Danish seafarers. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(4):720–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baygi FJO, Qorbani M, Farshad A, Salehi S, Mohammadi F, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of cardio-metabolic risk factors in iranian seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2016;67(2):59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fort E, Massardier-Pilonchery A, Bergeret A. Alcohol and nicotine dependence in French seafarers. IntMaritHealth. 2009;60:18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rongen ARS, Lenthe F, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion a meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):406–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Quintiliani LPS, Sorensen G. Healthy eating strategies in the workplace. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2010;3(3):182–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liberati AAD, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Furlan ADPV, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2009;34(18):1929–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tufanaru C MZ, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors): Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, Available from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ 2017.

  10. 10.

    Hjarnoe LL. Health promotion in the Danish maritime setting: challenges and possibilities for changing lifestyle behavior and health among seafarers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sarnni HLM, Niemi L, Pentti J. Health promotion in the finish shipping industry. Int Marit Health. 2001;52:44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Swanson NABC, Long MA, Lee R. Controlled trial for smoking cessation in a navy shipboard population using nicotine patch, sustained-release buproprion, or both. Mil Med. 2003;168(10):830–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Williams A, Hagerty B, Brasington M, Brasington SJ, Clem JB, Williams DA. Stress gym: Feasibility of deploying a web-enhanced behavioral self-management program for stress in a military setting. Mil Med. 2010;175:487–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hjarnoe LL, A. What does it take to get a healthy diet at sea? A maritime study of the challenges of promoting a healthy lifestyle at the workplace at sea. Int Marit Health. 2014;65:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Booth-kewley S, Andrews AM, Shaffer RA, Gilman PA, Minagawa RY, Brodine SK. One-year follow-up evaluation of the sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus intervention program in a marine corps sample. Mil Med. 2001;166:987–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jepsen JRR, H. B. The metabolic syndrome among Danish seafarers: a follow-up study. Int Marit Health. 2016;67:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gasier HG, Gaffney-Stomberg E, Young CR, Mcadams DC, Lutz LJ, Mcclung JP. The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation during a prolonged submarine patrol. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;95:229–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Duplessis CA, Harris EB, Watenpaugh DE, Horn WG. Vitamin D supplementation in underway submariners. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76:569–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bennett B, Schlichting C, Bondi KR. Cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive performance before and after confinement in a nuclear submarine. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985;56:1085–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chan CWPL. Lifestyle health promotion interventions for the nursing workforce: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(15-16):2247–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schröer SHJ, Pieper C. Evidence-based lifestyle interventions in the workplace—an overview. Occup Med. 2013;64(1):8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lemon SCZJ, Li W, Estabrook B, Rosal M, Magner R, Andersen V, Borg A. Hale J Step ahead a worksite obesity prevention trial among hospital employees. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sorensen GLL, Hunt MK. Worksite-based research and initiatives to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Prev Med. 2004b;39:S94–S100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pougnet RPL, Loddé B, Canals L, Bell S, Lucas D, et al. Consumption of addictive substances in mariners. Int Marit Health. 2014;65(4):199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cahill KLT. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;26(2):CD003440.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Eisen KPAG, Bollash M, Pescatello LS. Stress management in the workplace: a comparison of a computerbased and an in-person stress-management intervention. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24:486–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wolever RQBK, McCabe K, Mackenzie ER, Fekete E, Kusnick CA, et al. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):246–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kuster AT DT, Luong Thanh BY, Agarwal A, Durand-Moreau QV, Kirkehei I. Computer-based versus in-person interventions for preventing and reducing stress in workers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(8. Art. No.: CD011899):1-46.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Solveig Bøggild Dohrmann for her contribution to data extraction and Mr. Nguyen Pham Anh Tuan—Master student of Public Health at the University of Southern Denmark—for his assistance in preparing the first draft of the tables. Also, the authors would like to thank Alborz University of Medical Sciences for their contribution to the study.

Funding

This work was done without any fund.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.B conceived and designed the review. F.B, SH. J, M.D, and M.Q participated in the literature review. F. B participated in data extraction. F.B and M.Q participated in the interpretation of the results and drafting the manuscript. M.D edited the manuscript. JB. N edited the manuscript and provided supervision. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fereshteh Baygi or Mostafa Qorbani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Search strategy

Appendix 1: Search strategy

Table 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baygi, F., Djalalinia, S., Qorbani, M. et al. Lifestyle interventions in the maritime settings: a systematic review. Environ Health Prev Med 25, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00848-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Maritime settings
  • Interventions
  • Systematic Review