Skip to content


  • Review article
  • Open Access

Japan Environment and Children’s Study: backgrounds, activities, and future directions in global perspectives

  • Kazue Ishitsuka1,
  • Shoji F. Nakayama2,
  • Reiko Kishi3,
  • Chisato Mori4,
  • Zentaro Yamagata5,
  • Yukihiro Ohya1,
  • Toshihiro Kawamoto6 and
  • Michihiro Kamijima7Email author
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine201722:61

Received: 19 May 2017

Accepted: 28 June 2017

Published: 14 July 2017


There is worldwide concern about the effects of environmental factors on children’s health and development. The Miami Declaration was signed at the G8 Environment Ministers Meeting in 1997 to promote children’s environmental health research. The following ministerial meetings continued to emphasize the need to foster children’s research. In response to such a worldwide movement, the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOE), launched a nationwide birth cohort study with 100,000 pairs of mothers and children, namely, the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), in 2010. Other countries have also started or planned large-scale studies focusing on children’s environmental health issues. The MOE initiated dialogue among those countries and groups to discuss and share the various processes, protocols, knowledge, and techniques for future harmonization and data pooling among such studies. The MOE formed the JECS International Liaison Committee in 2011, which plays a primary role in promoting the international collaboration between JECS and the other children’s environmental health research projects and partnership with other countries. This review article aims to present activities that JECS has developed. As one of the committee’s activities, a workshop and four international symposia were held between 2011 and 2015 in Japan. In these conferences, international researchers and government officials, including those from the World Health Organization, have made presentations on their own birth cohort studies and health policies. In 2015, the MOE hosted the International Advisory Board meeting and received constructive comments and recommendations from the board. JECS is a founding member of the Environment and Child Health International Birth Cohort Group, and has discussed harmonization of exposure and outcome measurements with member parties, which will make it possible to compare and further combine data from different studies, considering the diversity in the measurements of variables between the studies. JECS is expected to contribute to the international environmental health research community and policy-making. More international collaboration would enhance our understanding of the possible environmental causes of diseases and disabilities.


Children’s environmental healthBirth cohort studyEnvironmental policyChemical exposureInternational collaborationJapan Environment and Children’s study (JECS)


Exposure to harmful environment in a prenatal period and early lifetime can affect health in both childhood and adulthood [14]. The fetus and young children are vulnerable to environmental hazards resulting in serious health problems or altering developmental processes [5]. World Health Organization (WHO) reported that around 20% of global deaths among children under 5 years old were due to modifiable environmental factors [6].

Based on the growing concern about environmental impacts on children’s health, the Miami Declaration on Children’s Environmental Health was signed at the G8 Environment Ministers Meeting in 1997. The Miami Declaration expressed the commitment of the member countries to children’s environmental health, including concerted actions in policy areas and consideration of child health in risk assessments [7]. The following ministerial meetings continued to emphasize the need of fostering children’s research. Especially in 2009, the Japanese Environment Minister and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator jointly addressed the G8 Environment Ministers Meeting in Syracuse, Italy, regarding the need for international collaboration on research related to children’s health and the environment, including the impacts of chemicals and heavy metals, the effects of climate change, and improving the knowledge and building the capacity of all professionals involved in children’s environmental health issues.

In Japan, the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) set up an Advisory Commission for Children’s Environmental Health in 2005 to discuss future efforts for children’s environmental health. In 2006, the Commission proposed several activities including MOE-funded key research projects. In light of the commission’s proposition, MOE set up the Advisory Committee of the Epidemiological Research on Children’s Environmental Health in 2007, which recommended the commencement of a large-scale birth cohort study to evaluate associations between environmental chemical exposure and children’s health [8]. Following the recommendation, study protocol planning started under the Working Group of the Epidemiological Research for Children’s Environmental Health in 2008. In April 2010, the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), a nationwide and government-funded birth cohort study, was launched aiming to evaluate the associations between the environment and children’s health and development. In the JECS, 100,000 pregnant women were enrolled between 2011 and 2014, with their children to be followed up until they reach 13 years of age [9]. In other parts of the world, such nationwide large-scale birth cohort studies are being conducted or have been planned to examine associations between the environment and children’s health. In Europe, for example, two Nordic countries started large-scale birth cohort studies, the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) and the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), in the late 1990s [10, 11]. Both the DNBC and MoBa have recruited more than 100,000 pregnant women [10, 11]. The French Longitudinal Study of Children (ELFE) with 20,000 participating children started an initial enrollment interview of mothers at the child’s birth in 2011, the same year that the JECS started recruitment of pregnant women [12]. The United States of America tried to launch a nationwide birth cohort study named the National Children’s Study with 100,000 participating children, which was canceled in 2014 after 5000 children had been recruited in pilot studies [13, 14] and subsequently replaced with the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program that is aiming to track 100,000 children of existing cohort studies [15]. In Asia, Korea has started a nationwide cohort study named the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (KoCHENS) in 2015, in which 100,000 pregnant women will be enrolled [16].

Individual cohort studies may be able to uncover environmental risk factors on children’s health on their own. Moreover, research collaboration between such studies would have benefits in obtaining a large sample size with increased statistical power to enable investigation of the environmental causes of rare diseases. In addition, the international data pooling may allow one to observe more diverse exposures and outcomes reflecting regional, cultural, and ethnic differences among countries [17].

Here, we report international collaboration that JECS has developed, including the International Symposia and International Advisory Board (IAB) meeting.

JECS International Symposia and launch of the JECS International Liaison Committee

Table 1 shows the JECS international workshop and symposia held by MOE. All the conferences were open to the public free of charge. Participants included researchers, citizens, and the media. The first conferences, which were named the JECS Workshop on International Linkage and JECS International Symposium, were held in Tokyo in February 2011. Affiliations of the conference participants included the WHO, the United Nations Environment Programme, the DNBC, and the National Children’s Study in the United States of America. They recognized the importance of coordination and cooperation between countries and international organizations to enable data pooling and comparison of data from large-scale cohorts in different countries. A recommendation was made to establish an international working group on such harmonization.
Table 1

JECS international symposia

Conference title (date)



Country or organization of speakers/panelists

Titles of sessions/presentations

Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Workshop on International Linkage

(2–3 Feb. 2011/workshop was held for researchers)






United States of America

Session 1: planning large-scale birth cohort studies (five speakers)



United States of America

Session 2: environmental exposure assessment in cohort studies (two speakers)



United States of America

Session 3: for what unexpected events must one prepare in site operations? (four speakers)



Session 4: follow-up activities in birth cohort studies (one speaker)



Session 5: outcome and measurements (one speaker)



Session 6: expectation for birth cohort studies (one speaker)





Session 7: international liaison of national cohort studies (three speakers)

JECS International Symposium

(4 Feb. 2011/open to the general public)




Outline of Japan Environment and Children’s Study focusing on the effects of environmental chemicals



The Danish National Birth Cohort



Mothers and Children’s Environmental Health Study


United States of America

The National Children’s Study



Coordinating and harmonizing long-term cohort studies of children’s environmental health



An evaluation of environmental health risks and risk management strategies among children in developing countries


International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium (I4C), Australia

International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium initiative



International linkage in JECS

JECS International Symposium in Kitakyushu, Japan

(28 Feb. 2012)


University of Occupational and Environmental Health


Japan Environment and Children’s Study


United States of America

National Children’s Study USA



Concept of a birth cohort study as contribution to health-related environmental monitoring in Germany



Coordination and harmonization of the next generation of large-scale birth cohorts



Report from WHO Working Group for Coordination of the Next Generation of Large-scale Birth Cohorts



Progress in Japan Environment and Children’s Study



Current progress of the “Hokkaido Cohort Studies on Environment and Children: congenital abnormality, development, and allergy”



A study of child development in northeast Japan



Pilot studies for JECS



Expectations for JECS

JECS International Symposium, Nagoya, Japan

(15 Nov. 2013)


Nagoya City University


Background to international linkage


United States of America

U.S. National Children’s Study



German activities



Shanghai Birth Cohort



French National Birth Cohort


United States of America

Report from the working group related to the international collaboration in large-scale birth cohort studies



Roadmap of Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) for the future



What has been proved and what will be proved in JECS



United States of America

Expectations for JECS (four speakers)

Fourth JECS International Symposium

(15 Dec. 2015)


Chiba University


Recent global environmental change and children’s health



Preliminary results of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)



The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study



An overview of the Danish National Birth Cohort



Current status of birth cohort studies in Asia




United States of America


Panel discussion: Promoting birth cohort studies: from the perspective of information dissemination (four panelists)

Soon after, the MOE launched the JECS International Liaison Committee with the following main aims: (a) Collecting information about birth cohort studies conducted outside Japan and methods for measurements of chemical exposure and outcomes relevant to JECS, (b) disseminating information about the study design, methods, and results of JECS to international scientific communities, and (c) international collaboration, including harmonization of study protocols and pooled analysis [18]. In order to collect and share information and opinions, members of the International Liaison Committee attended the scientific conferences (Table 2) and international working group meetings described later. In 2016, the International Liaison Committee also launched a Travel Grant for Young JECS Researchers to train and educate them and thereby to sustain JECS in the decade to come.
Table 2

Examples of conference presentations relating to activities of JECS International Liaison Committee



Type of presentation

Presenting authors

Titles of presentations




Mori K

Japan Environment and Children’s Study - Pilot Study and Research Launch


Toda E

International Coordination in Birth Cohorts




Nakayama SF

Japan Environment and Children’s Study




Nakayama SF

On-going harmonization of exposure questionnaires among large-scale birth cohort studies


Nakayama SF

Background on the Environment and Child Health International Birth Cohort Group


Nakayama SF

Harmonization of QA/QC measures among large-scale children’s environmental studies




Nakayama SF

Preliminary biomonitoring data from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study




Nakayama SF

Development of personal sampling devices and chemical screening methods for large-scale epidemiology and human biomonitoring studies


Nakayama SF

Biomonitoring as part of exposome measurement in Japan Environment and Children’s Study


Nakayama SF

We do exposome as much as we can: Japan Environment and Children’s Study




Kamijima M

Present status and preliminary results of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)




Kanatani K

Effect modifiers of desert dust exposure to allergic symptoms–From an adjunct study of Japan Environment and Children Study (JECS)c

Abbreviations: ISEE International Society for Environmental Epidemiology, ISES International Society of Exposure Science, ISIAQ International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate, PPTOX V Fifth Conference on Prenatal Programming and Toxicity, SOT Society of Toxicology

aJoint meeting of ISES and ISEE

bISES, ISEE and ISIAQ hosted the joint meeting

cThis presentation was supported by the Travel Grant for Young JECS Researchers

The second JECS International Symposium was held in Kitakyushu in 2012. Researchers in the environmental health field made presentations about their own birth cohort studies and children’s environmental health. The third JECS International Symposium was held in Nagoya in 2013. MOE introduced the background and history of an international collaborative activity described later, which was commenced under the initiatives of the WHO and research organizations of the United States of America, Germany, and Japan.

The fourth JECS International Symposium was held in Tokyo in 2015. The speakers and panelists discussed the current status and future of JECS and children’s environmental health in the world. First, the Director of the Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health of WHO spoke about “Recent Global Environmental Change and Children’s Health.” She mentioned new emerging environmental exposures, including global climate change, ozone depletion, and electronic waste. The environmental burden of diseases in children was the highest in the poorest countries. The JECS results are expected to help global heath communities understand the impacts of the environment on children, and also assist government administrators in developing countermeasures to protect children and develop prevention strategies from adverse effects. Second, the principal investigator of JECS reported that the response rate of follow-up questionnaires was still high in the study at the present time. He also showed the recent results of JECS [19]. Researchers of the DNBC and MoBa also reported the current status of their cohort studies and scientific results.

International Advisory Board

MOE also held the first IAB meeting on 14 December 2015 [20]. The purpose of the meeting was to receive suggestions and to advice on the design, protocol, and procedures of JECS from international experts involved in environmental health and birth cohort studies in Europe, the United States of America and Asia. Table 3 lists members of the IAB.
Table 3

International Advisory Board members [20]



Marie-Aline Charles

Ined-Inserm Elfe, France

Andre Conrad

Toxicology, Health-related Environmental Monitoring, German Environment Agency, Germany

Ruth A Etzel

Office of Children’s Health Protection, Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America

Per Magnus

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway

Mads Melbye

Management Board, Statens Serum Institut, Denmark

Maria P Neira

Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization

Ying Tian

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environment Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Christopher P Wild

International Agency for Research on Cancer

Birgit Wolz

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety, Germany

Jun Jim Zhang

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China

Overall, international experts stated that the JECS was a unique study that was important not only for Japan but also for the global public health community. The expected results would serve to protect and improve the health and well-being of children and generations to come throughout the world by developing legislation and social frameworks. There were two key points that the IAB highlighted during the meeting. First, by collecting data on children during the most important period of their growth, the JECS may be able to determine developmental critical windows impacted by the environment. Second, the JECS organization structure is impressive as it has led to outstanding accomplishments, including the large participant registration, high consent and response rates, and extensive collection of biological samples during pregnancy and at birth, which makes the JECS an extremely valuable birth cohort study for worldwide environmental health. The IAB recommended that the JECS should extend its originally planned follow-up period, i.e., 13 years after birth, in order to further examine the environmental impacts on adolescent health given the scarcity of such studies.

More specifically, the IAB focused on four main perspectives, i.e., JECS study design, organization structures, communication with participants and the public, and international collaboration (Table 4).
Table 4

Main recommendations of International Advisory Board [20]

Key points

Details of actions


JECS study design


Strategy of questionnaires

Collecting information not only from mothers but from fathers, teachers, and children themselves; appropriate frequency and length of questionnaires; use of web-based questionnaire

Outcome measurements

Including pediatric examination for collecting objective data

Environmental measurements

Collection of biospecimens from children; data analysis from biospecimens and questionnaires together; set priority of chemical exposures paying close attention to other relevant research projects

Seek assent from children

Conduct a pilot study

JECS organizational structure


Collaboration among different disciplines

Health sector and schools

Communication with public


Disseminate progress and research outcomes of JECS through media

Increasing presence in social media, e.g., television, newspapers, and press conferences

Co-operate with public speakers

Seeking support from celebrities, journalists, and eminent doctors

JECS international collaborations


Develop international collaboration

Sharing goals

Share information among study teams

Study protocols, procedures, and harmonization of methodologies

Abbreviations: JECS Japan Environment and Children’s study

As for JECS study design and plans, the IAB members discussed four perspectives: (a) Questionnaires, (b) outcome measurements, (c) exposure measurements, and (d) assent acquisition from children [20]. The following were parts of discussions regarding these issues. The IAB suggested the frequency of questionnaire administration should be reduced after the participating children reach age six in order to maintain the retention rates and to reduce the participants’ burden. The participants may feel tired from too many questionnaires and lose motivation to continue their engagement. On the contrary, to assess the within-individual variation in environmental exposures, intervals of 6 months between questionnaires might be too long. More frequently applied shorter questionnaires may be beneficial for assessment of some exposure sources such as food consumption and time-location-patterns, which are subject to recall bias. Web-based questionnaires could also be used in collecting information from children. In Japan, since most parents and guardians use mobile phones, the questionnaires could be adapted for mobile use as well. Electronic questionnaires such as web-based ones can also be designed in a way that the participating children would feel as if they are playing a game.

The IAB members recommended JECS to conduct examinations by pediatricians on as many participating children as possible. Since a nationwide disease registry system is not available in Japan, the planned pediatric examinations would be important for improving the quality of children’s health assessment.

The IAB’s suggestion regarding the assessment of environmental exposure was to collect biospecimens from children around 6 years old. Biological samples from children will be important for directly assessing children’s exposure levels. Data from biomonitoring and questionnaires should be evaluated together. Long-term storage of biospecimens is important for later analysis. JECS should pay close attention to other relevant research projects in the selection and measurements of priority contaminants. Collaborations with other international research projects would be helpful in selecting the target chemical substances for the study and avoiding unnecessary effort to develop new methods for measurements and analyses.

Finally, the IAB recommended that JECS should carefully study the need and timing of obtaining informed consent/assent from participating children. A pilot trial should be conducted to ensure that this process does not jeopardize the long-term participation of the children. The age at which they will be asked for their assent or consent to the study should be defined after thorough consideration. Experiences in European cohort studies could be helpful for the JECS. They obtained informed consent from children at 18 years of age.

The second perspective reviewed by the IAB was the JECS organizational structure. The IAB recommends more intensive collaboration with the health sector of the government, including the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, for the further progress of JECS. Although JECS is a MOE project with a focus on the effects of chemical exposure on children’s health, the JECS outcomes can be applicable to the development of the public health practice in much broader areas. The involvement of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare would have a wide range of positive effects on the study quality of JECS as well as the development of the children’s health policy. MOE was recommended to cooperate with other ministries and agencies within the Japanese government to further utilize JECS outcomes. It would be beneficial for JECS to cooperate with school teachers and educational institutions in evaluating children’s behavior, activities, and development, because the participating children spend long hours at school once they enter. The IAB also recommended that JECS collaborate with other research projects, professionals, and medical communities.

The third perspective of the IAB review was communication with the public as well as participants to make JECS more visible, which would be important for them to recognize the value of maintaining their support for the study. Such communication efforts are essential to pursue research outcomes of high quality. The JECS presence in social media through the community is also critical and important. Press conferences and support from celebrities, specialized journalists, international organizations, and non-government organizations should also be explored further. The appearance of JECS representatives on television and in newspapers is effective as well.

Fourth, the IAB recommended that the JECS should lead international collaboration and promote more recognition from the international communities. This recommendation was based on their understanding that JECS had been involved in activities of the Environment and Child Health International Birth Cohort Group (ECHIBCG) [21], which have developed a framework on harmonization of exposure and outcome measurements between large-scale studies as described in the next section. Since JECS and other birth cohort studies share common goals to identify environmental causes of childhood diseases, collaboration with other nationwide birth cohort studies should be explored to share information about study protocols and procedures, and harmonize methodologies and instruments for analyzing biomarkers of exposure and pollutants in the environment with those studies. Such collaboration will make it possible to conduct pooled data analyses in the future.

International collaboration with birth cohort studies and children’s environmental health projects

JECS joins several collaborative activities. JECS International Liaison Committee members have attended meetings held by international research groups on children’s environmental health. In 2011, the WHO, the United States of America, Germany, and Japan took the initiatives to hold the first meeting of the WHO Working Group on Linkage on the Next Generation of Large-scale Birth Cohort Studies in Barcelona, Spain, which was based on the recommendation made in the JECS Workshop on International Linkage and the first JECS International Symposium. Along with the United States of America, Germany, France, and Shanghai (China), JECS was a founding member of the working group that was later re-named ECHIBCG [21]. The main aims of the ECHIBCG are to share information and to work towards harmonization of processes and procedures that provide the opportunity to compare methods and results and to conduct combined analyses of results in the future. ECHIBCG members are representative researchers of large-scale birth cohorts in progress or being planned, in principle, for the sake of developing children’s environmental health. The members have held monthly telephone conferences and met in person once or twice a year to harmonize exposure/outcome measurements [21]. Until November 2016, 14 meetings of the group had been held. The recent agenda has stressed information exchange of analytical methods, quality assurance and quality control of specific chemicals, and round-robin studies of the chemicals among group members.

JECS is also a participant in the International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium (I4C). The I4C is an international consortium, established in 2005 to assess the association between environmental exposures and childhood leukemia [22]. Although childhood cancers impact their lives, little is known about their etiology, and their incidences are too rare to be addressed by a single study. The I4C seeks to reveal associations between prenatal and postnatal exposures and child health. Involving many cohort studies, the I4C targets up to 500,000 subjects to explore the etiology of childhood cancer.

Occasionally, JECS has received invitations and requests for international exchanges or collaborations from researchers/research teams abroad. The JECS International Liaison Committee gives close consideration to such inquiries.

Future perspectives

The JECS international collaboration activities mentioned above will help to share information among international cohort studies and environmental health projects. Ongoing cohort studies can share their experiences on how to manage cohorts, how to develop strategies for measurements of chemical exposures, confounders, and outcomes by means of biomonitoring techniques, questionnaires, physical and development examinations.

Such international collaboration will promote replication and comparison of studies in different settings [23]. Standardizations of measurements among research teams are very important for collaboration. The ongoing collaboration will also be invaluable for analyzing differences in socioeconomic and psychosocial background among countries and regions.


The JECS is expected to contribute to international environmental health research community and policy-making. More collaboration with international research teams would provide the evidence needed by policy-makers and would amplify our knowledge of ways to prevent disease and disabilities.



Danish National Birth Cohort


Environment and Child Health International Birth Cohort Group


Étude longitudinale française depuis l’enfance (French Longitudinal Study of Children)


International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium


International Advisory Board


Japan Environment and Children’s Study


den norske Mor & barn-undersøkelsen (Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study)


Ministry of the Environment, Japan



Not applicable.


The Japan Environment and Children’s Study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. All authors have some involvement in the JECS International Liaison Committee. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in development of international symposiums and international advisory board. KI and MK conceptualized the paper and drafted the first manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the report, commented on drafts of the manuscript, and approved the final report.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
Centre for Health and Environmental Risk Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Center for Environmental and Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chuo-ku, Japan
Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
Department of Environmental Health, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Japan


  1. Barouki R, Gluckman PD, Grandjean P, Hanson M, Heindel JJ. Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: implications for research and public health. Environ Health. 2012;11:42. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Swanson JM, Entringer S, Buss C, Wadhwa PD. Developmental origins of health and disease: environmental exposures. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:391–402. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1237427. Epub 2009 Aug 26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Gillman MW, Barker D, Bier D, Cagampang F, Challis J, Fall C, et al. Meeting report on the 3rd International Congress on Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). Pediatr Res. 2007;61:625–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J, Hallqvist J, Power C. Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:778–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Grandjean P, Bellinger D, Bergman A, Cordier S, Davey-Smith G, Eskenazi B, et al. The faroes statement: human health effects of developmental exposure to chemicals in our environment. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007;102:73–5. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00114.x.Google Scholar
  6. Pruss-Ustun A, Wolf J, Corvalan C, Bos R, Neira M. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. World Health Organization. 2016. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  7. G7 Information Center: 1997 Declaration of the Environment Leaders of the Eight on Children’s Environmental Health. 1997. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  8. Advisory Committee of the Epidemiological Research for Children’s Environmental Health, Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Report on Epidemiological Research for Children’s Environmental Health. 2008. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  9. Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K, Toda E, Tsukamoto N, Hasegawa M, et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TIA, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort—its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29:300–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, Nystad W, Skjaerven R, Stoltenberg C. Cohort profile: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). How did the study come about? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1146–50. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vandentorren S, Bois C, Pirus C, Sarter H, Salines G, Leridon H. Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:58. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-9-58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. National Institute of Health Advisory Committee to the Director. Final report -December 12, 2014. Accessed 28 June 2017.
  14. Landrigan PJ, Baker DB. The National Children’s Study—end or new beginning? N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1486–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt CW. Growing a new study: environmental influences on child health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:A260–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. National Institute of Environmental and Health Sciences. National Institute of Environmental Research, Republic of Korea. Accessed 28 June 2017.
  17. Vrijheid M, Casas M, Bergström A, Carmichael A, Cordier S, Eggesbo M, et al. European birth cohorts for environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:29–37. doi:10.1289/ehp.1103823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakayama S, Kamjima M. International collaboration in Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Life Environ. 2014;59:34–8 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. Suzuki K, Shinohara R, Sato M, Otawa S, Yamagata Z, Japan Environment & Children’s Study (JECS) group. Association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and birth weight: an appropriately adjusted model from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:371–7. doi:10.2188/jea.JE20150185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ministry of the Environment, Japan and National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. Japan Environment and Children’s Study. International Advisory Board Meeting Report. 2016. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  21. Etzel R, Charles MA, Dellarco M, Gajeski K, Jockel HK, Hirschfeld S, et al. Harmonizing biomarker measurements in longitudinal studies of children’s health and the environment. Biomonitoring. 2014;1:50–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown RC, Dwyer T, Kasten C, Krotoski D, Li Z, Linet MS, et al. Cohort profile: the International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium (I4C). Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:724–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kogevinas M, Andersen AM, Olsen J. Collaboration is needed to co-ordinate European birth cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:1172–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017