Skip to main content
  • Regular Article
  • Published:

Cancer understanding among Japanese students based on a nationwide survey

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine cancer understanding among Japanese primary and secondary school students.

Methods

The study design was a cross-sectional nationwide survey using a self-administered questionnaire. The prefecture with the lowest student population was set to 1, and that with the highest student population was set to 18 for elementary schools and 19 for junior high and high schools based on the ratio of the student population. In this way, 213 elementary schools, 222 junior high schools, and 208 high schools were selected from all 47 prefectures in Japan, and questionnaires were sent to each school. The questionnaire listed the names of 15 cancers and asked respondents to choose one answer from three: “Never heard of,” “Heard of/Don’t understand,” or “Heard of/Understand.”

Results

Response rates for schools were 44.1 % (n = 94) for elementary schools, 46.4 % (n = 103) for junior high schools, and 55.8 % (n = 116) for high schools. A total of 8,876 questionnaires were used for the analysis. Our survey suggests that the most commonly understood types of cancer differed by grade, with lung cancer the most commonly understood in elementary school, leukemia in junior high schools, and breast cancer in high schools. Girls tended to demonstrate greater cancer understanding than boys, with particularly large differences by gender in rates of understanding of breast and uterine cancer at each assessed grade level.

Conclusions

Here, we examined Japanese primary and secondary school students. Marked differences in cancer recognition by grade and gender suggest that educational efforts are needed at various grade levels and gender-specific cancer education. Further, more than 50 % of students at any school level were not familiar with most cancers. It suggests that cancer education is deficient.

Introduction

A total of 12.66 million new cases of cancer were estimated to have developed worldwide in 2008 with 7.56 million deaths occurring [1]. In Japan, cancer has been the leading cause of death since 1981; in 2012, approximately 361,000 persons died from cancer with cancer mortality rates of 350.8 for males and 225.7 for females (per 100,000 population) [35]. Further, approximately 30 % of Japanese adults die of cancer [2]. While rank order has shifted, the five cancer sites responsible for the greatest mortality and incidence have not changed drastically for 60 years. Causes of cancer and modifiable risk factors have been reported in recent studies [69]; however, while prevalent and high-risk cancers represent important targets of preventive public health efforts and understanding of the etiology and risk factors associated with many cancers has improved, cancer screening rates remain low [2, 10]. In addition, disease stigma and discrimination against cancer patients or their family members are important barriers to address through education. While improving cancer awareness from a young age through education is expected to help attenuate the negative effects of stigma and discrimination while improving screening rates, the established national curriculum has featured few such educational opportunities.

At present, educational material regarding cancer may be found only at the high school level in the Japanese school system, with elementary and junior high school health textbooks focusing more on prevention of other lifestyle-related diseases [1114]. Development of cancer education modules for school children is therefore one critical issue; however, basic understanding regarding cancer among Japanese school students, a successful cancer education curriculum, has not been reported. To develop an adequate health education curriculum, knowledge about symptoms, natural history, prevention, and causes of cancer—particularly knowledge about childhood leukemia and prevention of uterine cancer—should be taught from adolescence. As a first step, we investigated the current situation regarding cancer health education.

While public awareness or beliefs regarding cancer have been surveyed in several countries [1517], most of these surveys were administered to adults, not students. Previous studies have reported on children’s knowledge about cancer in the UK [18, 19], with results showing a general familiarity among children regarding names of certain cancers. We applied similar methods to assess the understanding of cancer names among Japanese students. This study also compares rates of cancer recognition among Japanese students with rates reported in studies conducted in other countries.

Here, to clarify the extent of cancer understanding among Japanese students, we conducted a large-scale survey study to assess recognition of cancer names.

Methods

Study design

Our study was a cross-sectional analysis of nationwide self-administered questionnaire survey data. The investigation was conducted in one class per school, which had been selected by participating schools.

Study setting

We conducted random sampling proportional to the student population of each prefecture and kind of school from “Zenkoku Gakkousouran 2012” using a random number table [20]. The prefecture with the lowest student population was set to 1, and that with the highest student population was set to 18 for elementary schools and 19 for junior high and high schools based on the ratio of the student population. In this way, 213 elementary schools, 222 junior high schools, and 208 high schools were selected from all 47 prefectures in Japan, and questionnaires, the request letter, survey protocol, individual envelopes, and a return envelope were sent to each subject school. We requested that the students be given the questionnaire and an envelope. The students were instructed to seal their responses in the envelope, and the collected written questionnaires in the envelopes were returned by the students’ teacher. We asked that the responses be returned all at once and requested the aid of each school in distributing and collecting responses and performing the investigation by class. The target populations of this survey were fifth grade elementary school students (10 or 11 years old), second-year (13 or 14 years old) junior high school students, and second-year (≥16 years old) high school students in Japan. School principals were asked to randomly select one class to participate in the survey. This survey was conducted from January to February 2013, with a return period of approximately 1 month.

Questionnaire

Questionnaire items were adapted from a previous study [18, 19] and reviewed by health education experts, including academic researchers, a medical doctor, an elementary school teacher, a physical education teacher, a school nurse, and a board of education supervisor. The questionnaire listed the names of 15 cancers and asked respondents to choose one answer from three: “Never heard of”, “Heard of/Don’t understand”, and “Heard of/Understand”. We described “heard of” as meaning the child had heard of the cancer before, but did not know much about it in detail; “understanding” was when the child had heard of the name and also understood some details about the cancer, such as target organ or cause. We used the same question items, with no explanation of the organs, for all students, from elementary to high school.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Desktop Version 19.0 for Windows (Brush Prairie, WA, USA). After excluding non-responders, we calculated the percentage and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for understanding of 15 different cancers. We also performed Fisher’s exact tests on the rate of understanding by gender.

Ethics statement

The experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Niigata University of Health and Welfare. A consent procedure was approved by the ethics committees. Students were informed that their answers would remain anonymous and that they were free to refuse participation in the study without penalty. Students were given the questionnaire and an envelope and were allowed to return blank questionnaires, if they chose to do so. We assumed that return of the questionnaires indicated consent for participation in the study by schools. All questionnaires were completed anonymously, and data entry and management was done under the supervision of the investigators.

Results

Response rate of schools and students

The school response rates were 44.1 % (n = 94) for elementary schools, 46.4 % (n = 103) for junior high schools, and 55.8 % (n = 116) for high schools (Table 1). A total of 9,139 questionnaires were collected, and respondents not reporting gender were excluded. In total, we analyzed the responses of 2,213 elementary school students, 2,960 junior high school students, and 3,703 high school students (total 8,876 students).

Table 1 Participation of schools

Elementary school students

Among male elementary school students (n = 1,101), high rates of understanding were observed for lung cancer (36.6 %) and leukemia (32.1 %) (Table 2). Low rates of understanding were observed for prostate cancer (4.4 %), testicular cancer (6.6 %), bladder cancer (6.7 %), ovarian cancer (7.8 %), and pancreatic cancer (9.1 %).

Table 2 Understanding of cancer among elementary school students

Among female elementary school students (n = 1,112), high rates of understanding were observed for breast cancer (44.7 %), lung cancer (35.3 %) and leukemia (34.7 %). Low rates of understanding were observed for prostate cancer (2.6 %), testicular cancer (5.2 %), bladder cancer (5.8 %),  pancreatic cancer (6.4 %), and ovarian cancer (7.8 %).

Junior high school students

Among male junior high school students (n = 1,520), high rates of understanding were observed for lung cancer (39.0 %), leukemia (36.7 %), and brain tumor (33.5 %) (Table 3). Low rates of understanding were observed for testicular cancer (8.3 %), ovarian cancer (8.7 %), and bladder cancer (9.0 %).

Table 3 Understanding of cancer among junior high school students

Among female junior high school students (n = 1,440), high rates understanding were observed for breast cancer (50.9 %), leukemia (44.7 %), uterine cancer (43.4 %), lung cancer (39.4 %), and brain tumors (38.4 %). Low rates of understanding were observed for testicular cancer (7.3 %), bladder cancer (8.1 %), and prostate cancer (9.1 %).

High school students

Among male high school students (n = 1,546), high rates of understanding were observed for lung cancer (47.9 %), leukemia (43.5 %), breast cancer (40.1 %), stomach cancer (35.9 %), brain tumors (35.8 %), skin cancer (34.8 %), and esophageal cancer (33.4 %) (Table 4). While low rates of understanding (<10 %) were not observed for any cancer, bladder cancer (12.9 %) had the lowest rate of understanding.

Table 4 Understanding of cancer among high school students

Among female high school students (n = 2,157), high rates of understanding were observed for breast cancer (60.0 %), leukemia (55.5 %), uterine cancer (51.6 %), lung cancer (48.3 %), brain tumors (41.4 %), skin cancer (38.8 %), stomach cancer (37.4 %), and esophageal cancer (36.2 %). Rate of understanding was lowest for bladder cancer (10.4 %).

Gender differences in understanding

Girls were more likely to report “Heard of/Understand” for breast cancer and uterine cancer than boys (Fig. 1). The rates of understanding for breast cancer were 26.9 % in males and 44.7 % in females for elementary school students (p < 0.001); 29.6 % in males and 50.9 % in females for junior high school students (p < 0.001); and 40.1 % in males and 60.0 % in females for high school students (p < 0.001). Similarly, the recognition rates for uterine cancer were 17.3 % in males and 28.3 % in females for elementary school students (p < 0.001); 17.4 % in males and 43.4 % in females for junior high school students (p < 0.001); and 26.9 % in males and 51.6 % in females for high school students (p < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Response rates of “Heard of/Understand” about breast cancer and uterine cancer. ***p < 0.001 by Fisher’s exact test. Error bar standard error

Discussion

In the present study, we attempted to clarify the current status of cancer understanding among Japanese school students by means of a self-administered questionnaire. This nationwide survey included a large sample of children (n = 8,876) from throughout Japan. We found that girls were more knowledgeable than boys regarding breast and uterine cancer. Awareness of lung cancer and leukemia was high from elementary school through high school. Cancer understanding was greatest among high school students and lowest among elementary school students.

In a previous UK study of children aged 15–16 years, the cancers for which respondents responded with “Heard of/Know about” were lung cancer (67.7 %), leukemia (56.1 %), and breast cancer (54.5 %) [18]. High school students in the present study were aged approximately 16–17 years. Despite the similarity in age range, recognition rates of lung cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer among UK students were higher than among Japanese students. However, recognition of uterine cancer was higher among Japanese high school students than UK ones (41.3 vs. 22.8 %). This discrepancy may be explained by the fact that a national government project targeted at females aged 13–16 years and recommending vaccination against HPV were conducted in Japan from 2010 to 2013.

Another study reported that awareness of childhood cancer among adolescents in Britain aged 11–17 years was most common for leukemia (20.1 %) [21]. In addition, breast cancer was the most commonly recognized female cancer for three-quarters of adolescents (76.6 %). Although the methods of investigation were slightly different from those used in the present study, similar results of high recognition of leukemia and breast cancer were obtained.

In a recent study among Scottish children aged 8–11 years, the type of cancer most frequently reported by both gender groups of primary school grades 4 and 6 was breast cancer, followed by lung cancer [19]. Lung cancer is typically discussed when learning about smoking prevention in Japanese elementary school health classes. Similarly, in Japan, many movies and TV dramas depict characters suffering from leukemia, some of which have proven quite popular. In addition, infant leukemia is often shown in the media. Breast cancer is also the leading cancer incidence site among Japanese females, therefore a student is more likely to know someone with breast cancer than with another type of cancer. Additionally, the “pink ribbon” campaign for breast cancer prevention is promoted in Japan, thereby increasing notoriety of the cancer among the populace.

More than 90 % of Japanese high school students answered “heard of” for uterine cancer in the present study. Previous reports have proven similar to our own, with more than 90 % of Swedish young adults and parents having heard of cervical cancer and 70 % of young men being aware of the disease [22]. Another study found that 85 % of respondents to a survey conducted among female Malaysian university students were aware of cervical cancer [23]. Based on these results, the next step is to clarify the extent of understanding and promote knowledge of viral causes of uterine cancer and methods of prevention.

The total incidence of cancer in Japan for 2007 was estimated to be 704,090 [4]. Among site-specific cancers in Japan in 2007, the top five most incident cancers among males were stomach, lung, colon/rectum, prostate, and liver. In females, the breast was the leading cancer site, followed by the colon/rectum, stomach, lung, and liver. According to a recent report on cancer mortality in Japan, the site-specific cancers with the highest mortality among men were lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, and prostate cancer [5]. Although the prostate was one of the most common sites for cancer among males, few respondents knew about or had even heard of prostate cancer in our study. In contrast, breast cancer was relatively well known by respondents of both genders. Conversely, while the actual incidence of leukemia was not markedly high, the cancer was still well known among students.

Knowledge of the etiology and natural history of cancer is important for effectively implementing a preventive education curriculum, and further research in Japan similar to studies conducted in other countries is warranted [2426]. Additionally, given that the screening rate for breast cancer in Japan is less than 25 % (lower than other countries) despite the markedly high rate of recognition among high school students (90 %) [3], an effective educational program for improving the screening rate must be considered. Further, since prevention strategies are known for a number of cancers in Japan [9], education addressing preventable risk factors should be considered.

In the course of study of health and physical education in high school level [11], contents about cancer are described as follows: “Students understand the necessity of healthy lifestyle, including the lifestyle of well balanced in terms of diet, exercise, rest and sleep, to prevent lifestyle-related disease and to maintain health. And also understand that the lifestyles are deeply related to the diseases such as malignant neoplasm, coronary heart disease, dyslipidemia, and periodontal disease.” These are related contents on cancer, but do not directly address the knowledge of cancer. Fewer than 50 % of students of all school levels were familiar with most cancers. It suggests that cancer education is deficient. The framework of cancer education should be examined to improve students’ fundamental understandings.

At present, educational materials regarding cancer in health textbooks are on sections of lifestyle-related diseases prevention, harm of smoking, and community health. Knowledge of lung cancer among elementary and junior high school student is low. It means the need to expand educational curricula related to this disease. Moreover, the difference between boys and girls in knowledge of uterine and breast cancers was relatively large, suggesting that cancer education to increase common recognition is necessary.

As an institutional problem, cancer knowledge is generally not included in the content that students are taught directly or on which they are evaluated. Further research is needed to determine the optimal target age, the appropriate teaching materials, and the methods of evaluation for cancer education. The practical curriculum study is also needed to assess that what contents of cancer education should be included in health and physical education or special activities or integrated studies.

Several limitations to the present study warrant mention. First, given that we analyzed only one grade from each school level, we may have arrived at different conclusions had we examined trends in other grades. Second, we showed the number of participating schools and responses by prefecture; however, students’ response rates and demographic differences were unknown. Finally, the response of “Heard of/Understand” regarding any given cancer failed to capture the extent of students’ understanding. For example, while the distinction between “heard of” and “understand” for leukemia was probably clear, whether students understanding lung cancer as “a cancer that occurs in the lungs” would answer “Heard of/Don’t understand” or “Heard of/Understand” was uncertain.

In conclusion, findings from our nationwide survey indicate that the most commonly recognized cancers differed by grade, suggesting that targeted educational efforts are needed at various grade levels. Further, marked differences in cancer recognition by gender suggest the need for gender-specific cancer education. More than 50 % of students at any school level were not familiar with most cancers. It suggests that cancer education is deficient.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research. CANCER STATISTICS IN JAPAN 2013. http://ganjoho.jp/pro/statistics/en/backnumber/2013_en.html Accessed 10 Mar 2014.

  3. Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo K, et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2005: based on data from 12 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(1):139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibatal A, et al. Cancer Incidence and Incidence Rates in Japan in 2007: a study of 21 population-based cancer registries for the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(3):328–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katanoda K, Matsuda T, Matsuda A, et al. An updated report of the trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(5):492–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harvard Report on Cancer Prevention. Cancer Causes Control 7 1996; 1: Suppl S3–S4.

  7. Danaei G, Hoorm SV, Lopez AD, et al. Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366:1784–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue M, Sawada N, Matsuda T, et al. Attributable causes of cancer in Japan in 2005—systematic assessment to estimate current burden of cancer attributable to known preventable risk factors in Japan. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1362–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. OECD Health Data 2013. Health Care Utilisation http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/oecdhealthdata.htm Accessed 10 Mar 2014.

  11. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan. Course of Study for high school. Health and Physical Education. Kyoto, Higashiyamashobou 2009 (in Japanese).

  12. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan. Course of Study for junior high school. Section 7 Health and Physical Education. Section 7 Health and Physical Education http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/04/11/1298356_8.pdf Accessed 10 Mar 2014.

  13. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan. Course of Study for Elementary school. Section 9 Physical Education. http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2009/04/21/1261037_10.pdf Accessed 10 Mar 2014.

  14. Yako-Suketomo H, Kawamura Y, Kubota M. Cancer education in the school setting for upper-grade pupils—a consideration of relevancy to school subjects and teacher attitudes toward cancer education. Jpn J Sch Health. 2012;54(3):250–9 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stubbings S, Robb K, Waller J, et al. Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl 2):s13–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robb K, Stubbings S, Ramirez A, et al. Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl 2):s18–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon AE, Forbes LJ, Boniface D, et al. An international measure of awareness and beliefs about cancer: development and testing of the ABC. BMJ Open. 2012;2:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oakley A, Bendelow G, Barnes J, et al. Health and cancer prevention: knowledge and beliefs of children and young people. BMJ. 1995;310:1029–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Knighting K, Rowa-Dewar N, Malcolm C, et al. Children’s understanding of cancer and views on health-related behavior: a ‘draw and write’ study. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;37(2):289–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zenkoku Gakkosouran 2012. Tokyo: Harashobo, 2011 (in Japanese).

  21. Kyle RG, Forbat L, Hubbard G. Cancer awareness among adolescents in Britain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:580.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dahlström LA, Sundström K, Young C, et al. Awareness and knowledge of human papillomavirus in the Swedish adult population. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(2):204–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan YY, Hesham R, Qodriyah HMS. Knowledge and Attitude of University Students in Health Sciences on the Prevention of Cervical Cancer. Med J Malays. 2010;65(1):53–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayoumi MMM, Elbasuny MMM, Nasser AMA, et al. Saudi Young Females’ Level of Knowledge Regarding Cervical and Breast Cancer. Int J Nurs Sci. 2012;2(5):47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grunfeld EA, Ramirez AJ, Hunter MS, et al. Women’s knowledge and beliefs regarding breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002;86(9):1373–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, et al. Knowledge and perceptions of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer risk in adolescent girls. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):749–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff and students of participating schools for their help with this study. This study was supported by a Clinical Cancer Research for Health Labour Sciences Research Grants of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koshu Sugisaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugisaki, K., Ueda, S., Monobe, H. et al. Cancer understanding among Japanese students based on a nationwide survey. Environ Health Prev Med 19, 395–404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-014-0406-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-014-0406-6

Keywords