Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of lifestyle factors with children’s food intake (n=1693)

From: Relationship between maternal employment status and children’s food intake in Japan

Variable

Category (reference)

Children’s food intake (g/1000kcal)

White rice

Soybean products

Vegetables

Confectioneries

Sweetened beverage

β 95%CI

β 95%CI

β 95%CI

β 95%CI

β 95%CI

Maternal employment status

Working <8h (vs not working)

1.9 [−7.9, 11.8]

−0.4 [−2.4, 1.7]

−4.1 [−11.1, 2.9]

−2.7 [−6.1, 0.7]

−0.9 [−10.5, 8.7]

Working ≥8h (vs not working)

11.4 [1.0, 21.9] *

−1.4 [−3.5, 0.8]

−3.5 [−10.9, 3.9]

−4.0 [−7.6, −0.4] *

−0.8 [−10.9, 9.4]

Covariates for the child

 Sex

Girl (vs boy)

−26.3 [−33.4, −19.2] *

1.6 [ 0.1, 3.1] *

11.4 [ 6.4, 16.4] *

6.7 [ 4.2, 9.1] *

−2.2 [−9.1, 4.7]

 Grade

6th (vs 5th)

−1.3 [−8.5, 5.9]

−0.2 [−1.7, 1.3]

2.9 [−2.2, 8.0]

−1.5 [−3.9, 1.0]

8.9 [2.0, 15.9] *

 Nutrition knowledgea

Every 10% increase

−1.5 [−4.5, 1.5]

1.0 [ 0.4, 1.7] *

3.2 [1.0, 5.3] *

−1.6 [−2.7, −0.6] *

−4.1 [−7.0, −1.2] *

 Attitude toward dietb

Adequate (vs inadequate)

2.5 [−4.9, 10.0]

−0.1 [−1.6, 1.5]

13.4 [8.1, 18.6] *

−2.5 [−5.1, 0.0]

−10.9 [−18.1, −3.6] *

Covariates for the mother

 Nutrition knowledgea

Every 10% increase

1.9 [−0.7, 4.4]

0.0 [−0.5, 0.5]

0.9 [−0.9, 2.7]

−0.8 [−1.7, 0.0]

−1.1 [−3.6, 1.4]

 Attitude toward dietb

Adequate (vs inadequate)

−0.9 [−8.3, 6.4]

0.5 [−1.1, 2.0]

3.9 [−1.4, 9.1]

−1.2 [−3.7, 1.3]

−0.4 [−7.6, 6.8]

 Corresponding food intakec

g/1000kcal

0.2 [0.2, 0.3] *

0.2 [0.2, 0.3] *

0.3 [0.2, 0.3] *

0.3 [ 0.2, 0.3] *

0.2 [0.2, 0.3] *

 Sleeping hours (weekdays)

Hours

1.1 [−2.3, 4.6]

0.2 [−0.5, 0.9]

1.1 [−1.4, 3.5]

−0.6 [−1.8, 0.6]

−0.7 [−4.1, 2.6]

Family environment

 Cohabitation with husband (child’s father)

Yes (vs no)

−1.5 [−13.3, 10.3]

0.2 [−2.3, 2.6]

13.2 [4.9, 21.6] *

−0.6 [−4.6, 3.5]

−17.8 [−29.3, −6.3] *

 Cohabitation with mother (child’s grandmother)

Yes (vs no)

0.8 [−9.9, 11.6]

−2.2 [−4.4, 0.0]

5.6 [−2.0, 13.2]

3.2 [−0.5, 6.8]

3.5 [−6.9, 13.9]

 Socioeconomic status

Average (vs straitened)

3.8 [−4.3, 11.9]

0.9 [−0.8, 2.6]

4.8 [−1.0, 10.5]

1.4 [−1.4, 4.2]

−3.7 [−11.7, 4.2]

Affluent (vs straitened)

24.3 [12.0, 36.6] *

−0.9 [−3.5, 1.6]

−7.7 [−16.4, 1.0]

3.4 [−0.8, 7.7]

−11.9 [−23.9, 0.1]

 Frequency of eating out

≥ once a month

(vs < once a month)

−3.8 [−7.9, 0.2]

−0.1 [−0.9, 0.7]

−3.6 [−6.4, -0. 7] *

2.6 [1.2, 4.0] *

2.2 [−1.8, 6.1]

 Frequency of communication about diet (child: C, mother: M)

C:low-M:high

(vs C:low-M:low)

3.2 [−6.6, 13.1]

0.1 [−1.9, 2.1]

−0.7 [−7.7, 6.3]

−0.1 [−3.5, 3.3]

−12.1 [−21.6, −2.5] *

C:high-M:low

(vs C:low-M:low)

7.5 [−6.6, 21.7]

−0.9 [−3.9, 2.0]

−3.0 [−13.0, 7.0]

−1.0 [−5.9, 3.9]

−6.0 [−19.8, 7.7]

C:high-M:high

(vs C:low-M:low)

6.3 [−4.3, 17.0]

0.8 [−1.4, 3.1]

7.5 [−0.1, 15.1]

−2.9 [−6.5, 0.8]

−12.7 [−23.1, −2.3] *

  1. CI confidence interval
  2. a“Nutrition knowledge” is the percentage of correct answers to the nutrition knowledge questionnaire
  3. bAttitude toward diet was divided into adequate and inadequate based on responses to the questionnaire
  4. cMother’s corresponding food intake means the same kind of food intake as the child’s. For example, when the outcome was child’s vegetable intake, mother’s corresponding food intake was the mother’s vegetable intake
  5. *P < 0.05