Skip to main content

Table 3 Socioeconomic factors as a moderator in the relationship between LTPA and cMetS in adolescents

From: Biological and socioeconomic factors as moderator in relationship between leisure-time physical activity and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents from southern Brazil

 

cMetS

 

β (95% CI)

p

Model 1

LTPA

−0.00032 (−0.00053; −0.00010)

0.004

Socioeconomic status

  Upper

REF

 

  Middle

−0.00056 (−0.08548; 0.08435)

0.990

  Lower

−0.08158 (−0.23571; 0.07256)

0.299

LTPA × socioeconomic status

  LTPA × upper

REF

 

  LTPA × middle

0.00011 (−0.00018; 0.00040)

0.462

  LTPA × lower

0.00031 (−0.00030; 0.00092)

0.323

Model 2

LTPA

−0.00052 (−0.00082; −0.00022)

0.001

School system

  Municipal

REF

 

  State

−0.14094 (−0.23415; −0.04773)

0.003

  Private

−0.12554 (−0.30296; 0.05189)

0.165

LTPA × school system

  LTPA × municipal

REF

 

  LTPA × state

0.00037 (0.00002; 0.00072)

0.037

  LTPA × private

0.00019 (−0.00038; 0.00076)

0.519

Model 3

LTPA

−0.00024 (−0.00076; 0.00028)

0.362

School area

  Urban

REF

 

  Rural

−0.01034 (−0.12454; 0.10386)

0.859

LTPA × school area

0.00001 (−0.00045; 0.00045)

0.993

  1. β linear regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, LTPA leisure-time physical activity, cMetS clustered cardiometabolic risk score, REF reference category. Model 1: adjusted for a school system, school area, sex, skin color, maturational stage, and age. Model 2: adjusted for socioeconomic status, school area, sex, skin color, maturational stage, and age. Model 3: adjusted for socioeconomic status, school system, sex, skin color, maturational stage, and age