Table 1 The volume and centrality of domestic and international risk communication institutions
International institutions | Count | Centrality | Chinese institutions | Count | Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
King’s College London | 73 | 0.11 | Chinese Health Education Center | 14 | 0.00 |
Cornell University | 68 | 0.06 | School of Public Policy and Management, Xian Jiaotong University | 11 | 0.00 |
Harvard University | 57 | 0.17 | School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University | 10 | 0.00 |
University of Michigan | 48 | 0.16 | School of Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law | 8 | 0.00 |
University of Washington | 48 | 0.16 | School of Journalism and Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology | 6 | 0.00 |
University of Pennsylvania | 44 | 0.06 | School of Public Administration, Tsinghua University | 6 | 0.00 |
Max Planck Institute for Human Development | 43 | 0.01 | School of Communication, East China Normal University | 5 | 0.00 |
Ctr Dis Control Prevent | 42 | 0.02 | National School of Administration | 4 | 0.00 |
41 | 0.20 | Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention | 4 | 0.00 | |
The University of Sydney | 41 | 0.04 | School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University | 4 | 0.00 |