Skip to main content

Table 2 Two-way ANOVA for the differences of the variables according to the interaction between baseline/after or education using DVD video teaching materials/the web-based learning program and each mean value

From: Development of a program to prevent sexual violence among teens in Japan: education using DVD video teaching materials and web-based learning

 

Education using DVD video teaching materials (n=705)

Web bases learning (n = 250)

Education using DVD –Web bases learning ×

Baseline

After

Baseline-After a)

Baseline

After

Baseline-After a)

Baseline-After b)

M

SD

M

SD

F

p

M

SD

M

SD

F

p

F

p

Attitudes that lead to violence

0.46

0.43

0.25

0.31

107.70

<0.001

0.36

0.41

0.15

0.24

46.24

<0.001

0.03

0.862

 Attitude that lead to physical violence

0.41

0.63

0.15

0.38

87.80

<0.001

0.25

0.52

0.04

0.19

35.55

<0.001

1.06

0.303

 Attitude that lead to mental violenc

0.48

0.44

0.27

0.33

88.64

<0.001

0.39

0.42

0.18

0.27

41.50

<0.001

0.02

0.883

Attitude toward healthy conflict resolution

2.02

0.53

2.36

0.62

111.91

<0.001

2.08

0.52

2.52

0.53

82.72

<0.001

2.75

0.097

 Empathy

2.22

0.69

2.51

0.74

55.44

<0.001

2.35

0.63

2.71

0.54

45.90

<0.001

1.01

0.313

 Assertiveness

2.07

0.69

2.40

0.73

68.43

<0.001

2.15

0.70

2.58

0.60

54.34

<0.001

2.40

0.121

 Discussion with other individuals

2.12

0.77

2.48

0.78

75.56

<0.001

2.27

0.73

2.67

0.64

40.72

<0.001

0.18

0.672

 Attack avoidance

1.52

0.88

1.69

1.05

42.99

<0.001

1.34

0.69

2.01

1.07

55.78

<0.001

10.03

0.002

Dangerous attitudes that lead to sexual violence

0.43

0.54

0.23

0.45

55.89

<0.001

0.26

0.50

0.17

0.36

24.19

<0.001

0.02

0.880

Preventive attitudes toward sexual violence

2.62

0.58

2.68

0.64

3.46

0.063

2.61

0.60

2.80

0.45

15.94

0.001

4.26

0.039

  1. aThe measures were compared between baseline and after the survey on each of the two programs by ANOVA
  2. bThe interaction between the baseline/after and two intervention surveys was analyzed by two-way ANOVA