Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between TAR/TLR and cardiometabolic variables after adjusting for potential confounders

From: Associations between trunk-to-peripheral fat ratio and cardiometabolic risk factors in elderly Japanese men: baseline data from the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) study

 

Total subjects, N = 597

Medications for hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes

Users, N = 347

Non-users, N = 250

Non-overweight non-users, N = 199

Beta

P

Beta

P

Beta

P

Beta

P

TAR

 Systolic blood pressure

0.03

ns

0.04

ns

0.03

ns

− 0.02

ns

 Diastolic blood pressure

0.00

ns

0.04

ns

− 0.02

ns

− 0.09

ns

 LDL cholesterol

0.09

0.04

0.04

ns

0.19

< 0.01

0.22

< 0.01

 HDL cholesterol

− 0.25

< 0.01

− 0.25

< 0.01

− 0.22

< 0.01

− 0.20

< 0.01

 Total cholesterol

0.02

ns

− 0.02

ns

0.13

ns

0.16

ns

 Triglyceride

0.32

< 0.01

0.33

< 0.01

0.28

< 0.01

0.27

< 0.01

 Hemoglobin A1c

0.17

< 0.01

0.12

0.04

0.18

0.02

0.15

ns

 Fasting serum insulin

0.25

< 0.01

0.23

< 0.01

0.23

< 0.01

0.19

< 0.01

 Fasting plasma glucose

0.17

< 0.01

0.12

0.03

0.17

0.02

0.12

ns

 HOMA− IR

0.25

< 0.01

0.23

< 0.01

0.25

< 0.01

0.20

< 0.01

TLR

Systolic blood pressure

0.03

ns

0.04

ns

0.03

ns

− 0.02

ns

 Diastolic blood pressure

− 0.01

ns

0.03

ns

− 0.03

ns

− 0.10

ns

 LDL cholesterol

0.08

ns

0.02

ns

0.20

< 0.01

0.23

< 0.01

 HDL cholesterol

− 0.24

< 0.01

− 0.25

< 0.01

− 0.20

< 0.01

− 0.18

0.01

 Total cholesterol

0.02

ns

− 0.03

ns

0.16

0.03

0.18

0.03

 Triglyceride

0.32

< 0.01

0.32

< 0.01

0.29

< 0.01

0.28

< 0.01

 Hemoglobin A1c

0.17

< 0.01

0.12

0.03

0.19

< 0.01

0.15

ns

 Fasting serum insulin

0.25

< 0.01

0.24

< 0.01

0.21

< 0.01

0.16

0.03

 Fasting plasma glucose

0.17

< 0.01

0.12

0.03

0.17

0.02

0.09

ns

 HOMA− IR

0.25

< 0.01

0.24

< 0.01

0.23

< 0.01

0.16

0.03

  1. Biochemical marker values were logarithmically converted and then statistically analyzed
  2. Multiple regression analysis was used after adjusting for age, height, MET-minutes/week, current smoker, alcohol intake, energy intake, NaCl intake, and whole-body fat
  3. Beta represents the standard coefficient
  4. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
  5. MET-minutes/week was calculated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
  6. N, number; ns, not significant; TAR, trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio; TLR, trunk-to-leg fat ratio; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; MET, metabolic equivalent of task