Skip to main content

Table 6 Association between each item score and help-seeking intention for insomnia

From: Perceived effectiveness rating scales applied to insomnia help-seeking messages for middle-aged Japanese people: a validity and reliability study

  

Item score

 
  

1

2

3

4

5

Trend p

(A) Comprehensibility scale

       

 1) Read

N

7

24

209

169

191

0.023

 

n

1

13

87

85

101

 
  

14.3%

54.2%

41.6%

50.3%

52.9%

 

 2) Understand

N

7

32

205

185

171

0.040

 

n

1

21

79

95

91

 
  

14.3%

65.6%

38.5%

51.4%

53.2%

 

 3) Remember

N

11

48

250

168

123

< 0.001

 

n

3

23

96

92

73

 
  

27.3%

47.9%

38.4%

54.8%

59.3%

 

 4) Locate

N

8

26

280

170

116

< 0.001

 

n

3

12

111

89

72

 
  

37.5%

46.2%

39.6%

52.4%

62.1%

 

 5) Keep

N

9

24

245

203

119

< 0.001

 

n

1

14

92

99

81

 
  

11.1%

58.3%

37.6%

48.8%

68.1%

 

(B) Persuasiveness scale

       

 1) Believable

N

13

43

292

226

26

< 0.001

 

n

3

11

108

145

20

 
  

23.1%

25.6%

37.0%

64.2%

76.9%

 

 2) Convincing

N

15

57

308

199

21

< 0.001

 

n

3

17

128

120

19

 
  

20.0%

29.8%

41.6%

60.3%

90.5%

 

 3) Important

N

35

115

320

110

20

< 0.001

 

n

14

39

145

71

18

 
  

40.0%

33.9%

45.3%

64.5%

90.0%

 

 4) Confident

N

37

95

344

107

17

< 0.001

 

n

10

34

151

77

15

 
  

27.0%

35.8%

43.9%

72.0%

88.2%

 

 5) Friends

N

32

80

310

155

23

< 0.001

 

n

11

28

132

96

20

 
  

34.4%

35.0%

42.6%

61.9%

87.0%

 

 6) Positive thoughts

N

31

56

386

108

19

< 0.001

 

n

6

12

169

82

18

 
  

19.4%

21.4%

43.8%

75.9%

94.7%

 

 7) Agreeable

N

9

20

346

192

33

< 0.001

 

n

0

7

131

120

29

 
  

0.0%

35.0%

37.9%

62.5%

87.9%

 
  1. Cochran-Armitage test was performed to identify a significant linear trend
  2. N number of respondents, n number of people having a positive help-seeking intention for insomnia among the respondents