Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparisons between continuing group and institutionalized group of caregivers

From: Factors influencing caregivers’ burden among family caregivers and institutionalization of in-home elderly people cared for by family caregivers

Variablesa

Continuing group (n = 65)

Institutionalized group (n = 25)

p value

Adjustedb p value

Male

20 (30.8)

8 (32.0)

0.910c

0.637

Age

63.9 ± 10.0

61.2 ± 13.8

0.225d

0.941f

Time spent caregiving (h/day)

3.2 ± 2.4

3.9 ± 3.5

0.528d

0.973f

Time spent attending elderly (h/day)

5.3 ± 6.0

7.2 ± 7.8

0.428d

0.893d

Time when caregivers can leave without the elderly (h/day)

3.6 ± 3.6

2.8 ± 2.6

0.335d

0.985f

Duration of caregiving (months)

66.4 ± 48.1

54.5 ± 23.1

0.583d

0.399f

Have a job

19 (29.2)

8 (32.0)

0.797c

0.924

Relationship of caregiver to elderly

  Spouse vs. others

27 (41.5)

7 (28.0)

0.235c

0.338

  Daughter-in-law vs. others

10 (15.4)

13 (52.0)

0.001c

0.016

CES-D

  Score

14.6 ± 9.2

17.8 ± 9.1

0.087d

0.051f

  Depressed

21 (32.3)

15 (60.0)

0.016c

0.037

J-ZBI

35.1 ± 19.1

39.2 ± 17.4

0.356e

0.360f

  1. CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, J-ZBI Japanese version of the Zarit Burden Interview
  2. aData are presented as the number of subjects (n), with the percentage given in parenthesis, or as the mean ± SD, as appropriate
  3. bMantel–Haenszel test (adjusted for age of the elderly requiring care)
  4. cChi-square test
  5. dMann–Whitney U test
  6. eThe cut-off point was set as the median value
  7. f t-test