Skip to main content

Table 2 Responses to questions on the “Code of Conduct for Scientists”

From: Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey

Items on the questionnaire

Answer

Councilors

Junior members

P value

n

%

n

%

Do you know about the existence of the “Code of Conduct for Scientists” formulated by the Science Council of Japan?

Yes

48

25.4

12

9.8

<0.01*

Recognized title but did not know contents

73

38.6

37

30.3

 

No

68

36

73

59.8

 

Where did you receive information about the “Code of Conduct for Scientists” from? (if known)

Homepage of the Japanese Society for Hygiene

12

18.5

2

13.3

0.24

Study session at the Japanese Society for Hygiene general meeting

3

3.1

2

13.3

 

Homepage of an academic society other than the Japanese Society for Hygiene

3

4.6

0

0.0

 

Mass media

13

20.0

5

33.3

 

Internet

16

24.6

4

26.7

 

Lecture

1

1.5

1

6.7

 

Other

18

27.7

1

6.7

 

Do you think that the “Code of Conduct for Scientists” is adequately known among members of the JSH?

Yes

5

2.6

3

2.5

<0.05*

No

145

76.3

75

61.5

 

Not sure

40

21.1

44

36.1

 

What do you think is the most effective way to make the “Code of Conduct for Scientists” commonly known among more members of the JSH?

The Society’s homepage

25

13.8

11

9.1

0.29

Lectures at general meeting symposia

38

21.0

18

14.9

 

Holding a briefing session at the general meeting

12

6.6

10

8.3

 

Individual emails

27

14.9

29

24.0

 

Individual letters

25

13.8

15

12.4

 

Individual emails and letters

43

23.8

33

27.3

 

Other

11

6.1

5

4.1

 

Are you interested in the “Code of Conduct for Scientists”?

 

Yes

133

70

83

68.6

<0.05*

No

30

15.8

10

8.3

 

Not sure

27

14.2

28

23.1

 

What do you think about conducting research ethics education through the JSH?

Approve

133

69.3

84

68.9

0.54

Disapprove

13

6.7

5

4.1

 

Not sure

46

24.0

33

27.0

 

Please identify specific methods (for those who approve)

Creating guidelines

34

25.8

14

17.5

0.08

Lectures and workshops at Society meetings

44

33.8

40

50

 

The Society’s home page

10

7.6

11

13.8

 

Individual emails

12

9.1

5

6.3

 

Individual letters

12

9.1

4

5

 

Individual emails and letters

18

13.6

5

6.3

 

Other

2

1.5

1

1.3

 

Where do you think judgments on misconduct should be made?

Board of Directors

20

10.6

6

5.0

0.17

Ethics Committee

110

58.2

83

69.2

 

Create a new organization within the Japanese Society for Hygiene

51

27

26

21.7

 

Other

8

4.2

5

4.2

 

Do you think that a member of the JSH who has been cited for misconduct should be provided with an opportunity for rebuttal?

Yes

189

98.4

115

94.3

<0.05*

No

1

0.5

0

0.0

 

Not sure

2

1.0

7

5.7

 

Is it necessary for the Society to formulate its own “Code of Conduct for Scientists”?

Necessary

46

24.3

19

15.7

<0.01*

Not necessary

96

50.8

51

42.1

 

Not sure

47

24.9

51

42.1

 
  1. * Significant at P < 0.05