Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of the various analytical methods of assaying cotinine

From: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of nicotine metabolites

Reference

Methoda

Antigen

Cross-reactivityb (%)

Detection limit

Comparison with chromatographic methodsc

Heinrich-Ramm et al. [7]

RIA

   

2.4- to 2.9-fold higher than GC–MS

Kuo et al. [6]

ELISA

  

0.39–0.46 ng/mL

0.6- to 0.9-fold higher than GC-nitrogen-phosphorus

Ohta et al. [9]

ELISA

Cotinine-3-thyroglobulin

Nicotine (16)

0.03 ng/mL

1.4-fold higher than GC–MS

Wielkoszynski et al. [8]

ELISA

4-Carboxy-γ-cotinine

3HC (18.6), Nicotine N-oxide (5.1)

3–3.5 ng/mL

6-fold higher than TLC

Matsumoto et al. (present study)

ELISA

Cotinine-4 -γ-globulin

N (0.2), N-g (0.0), C-g (0.3), 3HC (101.3), 3HC-g (221.8)

1.3 ng/mL

3.2- to 5.9-fold higher than GC–MS

  1. aRIA Radioimmunoassay; ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
  2. bRatio to cotinine reactivity (100%). N Nicotine, N-g nicotine-glucuronide, C-g cotinine, 3HC 3′-hydroxycotinine, 3HC-g 3′-hydroxycotinineglucuronide
  3. cComparison with cotinine values from urine specimens. GC–MS Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, TLC thin-layer chromatography