Skip to main content

Table 2 Anthropometric and metabolic parameters by graded NAFLD

From: Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and relationship to metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and waist circumference

Parametersa

Non-NAFLD, category 1 (n = 113)

Mild–moderate NAFLD, category 2 (n = 25)

Serious NAFLD, category 3 (n = 12)

P for trendb

P valuec

WC (cm)

63.5 ± 0.8

76.5 ± 1.8

85.1 ± 2.1

<0.001

<0.001 (1 vs. 2)

0.026 (2 vs. 3)

<0.001 (1 vs. 3)

WC/H (index)

0.4 ± 0.005

0.5 ± 0.01

0.5 ± 0.01

<0.001

<0.001 (1 vs. 2)

<0.001 (1 vs. 3)

BMI (index)

18.9 ± 0.3

23.2 ± 0.7

26.5 ± 1.1

<0.001

<0.001 (1 vs. 2)

<0.001 (1 vs. 3)

0.035 (2 vs. 3)

SBP (mmHg)

105.6 ± 1.2

111.0 ± 2.3

116.4 ± 3.1

0.008

0.028 (1 vs. 3)

DBP (mmHg)

51.3 ± 0.9

56.0 ± 2.0

59.7 ± 2.6

0.004

0.024 (1 vs. 3)

TG (mg/dl)

56.2 ± 2.6

80.7 ± 14.6

90.5 ± 10.1

0.001

0.022 (1 vs. 2)

0.019 (1 vs. 3)

HDLC (mg/dl)

36.1 ± 0.6

30.5 ± 1.0

29.1 ± 2.3

<0.001

0.002 (1 vs. 2)

0.006 (1 vs. 3)

FPG (mg/dl)

91.7 ± 0.7

91.7 ± 1.2

94.7 ± 1.6

0.232

NS

IRI (μU/ml)

8.3 ± 0.3

10.8 ± 0.8

13.8 ± 1.4

<0.001

0.007 (1 vs. 2)

<0.001 (1 vs. 3)

HOMA-IR (index)

1.9 ± 0.1

2.4 ± 0.2

3.2 ± 0.3

<0.001

0.018 (1 vs. 2)

<0.001 (1 vs. 3)

  1. aFor definition of the terms, see the Abbreviation section
  2. bThe kruskal–Wallis test was performed to test for the difference among the three categories
  3. cPairwise difference between the three categories by Shaffe’s Multiple Comparison