Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between various dimensions of school furniture and respective anthropometric measurements of the school children

From: Complaints arising from a mismatch between school furniture and anthropometric measurements of rural secondary school children during classwork

Measurements

Age groups

10 years

11 years

12 years

13 years

14 years

15 years

Mean ± SD

% Difference

Mean ± SD

% Difference

Mean ± SD

% Difference

Mean ± SD

% Difference

Mean ± SD

% difference

Mean ± SD

% Difference

Bench height

46.3 ± 1.3

36.6

46.2 ± 1.6

29.4

45.7 ± 1.5

21.5

45.8 ± 1.6

12.8

46.6 ± 1.6

9.1

46.5 ± 2.0

5.7

Popliteal heighta

33.9 ± 2.2

35.7 ± 2.5

37.6 ± 2.3

40.6 ± 3.7

42.7 ± 3.5

44.0 ± 3.1

Per capita allotted length of bench

29.5 ± 7.8

5.4

28.9 ± 5.6

12.4

30.1 ± 6.2

13.3

19.5 ± 5.2

48.4

32.7 ± 7.2

14.6

34.1 ± 7.9

15.4

Bi-deltoid breadtha

31.2 ± 2.3

33.0 ± 2.6

34.7 ± 3.0

37.8 ± 4.3

38.3 ± 3.0

40.3 ± 3.1

Bench depth

26.9 ± 2.3

23.8

26.2 ± 1.5

31.6

26.5 ± 1.9

34.7

26.3 ± 1.8

40.2

27.1 ± 2.0

41.0

27.2 ± 1.9

41.8

Buttock-popliteal lengtha

35.3 ± 2.7

38.3 ± 2.8

40.6 ± 2.8

44.0 ± 4.5

45.9 ± 3.8

46.7 ± 2.8

Desk height

75.4 ± 2.7

36.1

75.1 ± 2.5

31.3

75.4 ± 2.1

26.7

74.8 ± 2.6

22.4

75.6 ± 2.5

18.9

75.9 ± 2.7

17.9

Elbow height from the floora

55.4 ± 2.2

57.2 ± 2.4

59.5 ± 2.3

61.1 ± 2.3

63.6 ± 2.1

64.4 ± 2.2

Per capita allotted length of desk

30.1 ± 7.2

25.7

30.4 ± 7.6

27.4

30.4 ± 7.7

30.0

30.9 ± 7.0

32.4

30.7 ± 8.3

33.8

31.2 ± 6.5

34.9

Elbow to elbow length (writing position)a

40.5 ± 6.2

41.9 ± 4.9

43.4 ± 7.2

45.7 ± 6.5

46.4 ± 5.4

47.9 ± 7.5

Clearance for standing

13.5 ± 2.4

14.4

14.4 ± 3.1

15.2

13.8 ± 2.5

1.4

13.9 ± 2.6

2.8

15.5 ± 2.1

2.6

15.4 ± 3.0

2.5

Maximum horizontal distance between calf and thighb

11.8 ± 1.7

12.5 ± 1.2

14.0 ± 1.1

14.3 ± 1.7

15.1 ± 1.3

15.8 ± 1.8

  1. aDuring sitting
  2. bDuring standing (all measurements are expressed in centimeters). The % difference was calculated by taking the difference between furniture dimensions and anthropometric dimensions, and it was expressed as percentage with respect to anthropometric dimensions