Skip to main content

Table 1 Residual sum of squares for age–period–cohort models and P values (based on the F test) for the significance of period effects and cohort effects during 1968–2002

From: Changes in pancreatic cancer mortality, period patterns, and birth cohort patterns in Japan: analysis of mortality data in the period 1968–2002

Prefecture

Male

Female

Prefecture

Male

Female

Residuala

P value for periodb

P value for cohortc

Residual

P value for period

P value for cohort

Residual

P value for period

P value for cohort

Residual

P value for period

P value for cohort

Hokkaido

0.536

0.402

<0.001

0.519

0.008

<0.001

Shiga

2.197

0.011

<0.001

4.528

0.732

<0.001

Aomori

1.985

0.930

<0.001

1.511

0.405

<0.001

Kyoto

1.250

0.320

<0.001

2.058

0.151

<0.001

Iwate

2.052

0.137

0.007

2.987

0.454

0.004

Osaka

0.444

0.024

<0.001

0.758

0.446

<0.001

Miyagi

0.610

<0.001

<0.001

2.178

0.002

<0.001

Hyogo

0.713

0.733

<0.001

0.641

0.650

<0.001

Akita

2.675

0.049

<0.001

3.022

0.133

<0.001

Nara

3.151

0.114

0.006

3.471

0.428

<0.001

Yamagata

2.148

0.496

<0.001

2.282

0.520

<0.001

Wakayama

3.153

0.005

<0.001

5.046

0.794

0.011

Fukushima

1.334

0.854

<0.001

1.579

0.564

<0.001

Tottori

5.253

0.903

0.016

5.011

0.096

<0.001

Ibaraki

2.532

0.361

<0.001

1.058

0.379

<0.001

Shimane

3.419

0.523

0.079

3.299

0.098

<0.001

Tochigi

1.759

0.266

<0.001

1.560

0.148

<0.001

Okayama

3.023

0.403

<0.001

2.290

0.646

<0.001

Gumma

0.637

0.022

<0.001

2.908

0.781

<0.001

Hiroshima

0.739

0.451

<0.001

1.710

0.963

<0.001

Saitama

0.843

0.014

<0.001

1.825

0.021

<0.001

Yamaguchi

1.611

0.255

<0.001

3.663

0.781

<0.001

Chiba

0.803

0.013

<0.001

1.806

0.285

<0.001

Tokushima

4.440

0.140

0.039

8.568

0.961

0.001

Tokyo

0.425

0.929

<0.001

0.585

0.384

<0.001

Kagawa

6.566

0.127

0.012

4.967

0.312

<0.001

Kanagawa

0.456

0.732

<0.001

1.551

0.164

<0.001

Ehime

2.415

0.941

<0.001

2.030

0.636

<0.001

Niigata

1.523

0.352

<0.001

1.261

0.943

<0.001

Kochi

1.744

0.110

<0.001

4.515

0.538

0.013

Toyama

1.425

0.020

<0.001

2.859

0.279

<0.001

Fukuoka

0.471

0.460

<0.001

1.752

0.761

<0.001

Ishikawa

6.575

0.741

0.030

2.619

0.112

<0.001

Saga

4.306

0.488

0.007

5.040

0.429

<0.001

Fukui

2.551

0.773

<0.001

3.613

0.019

<0.001

Nagasaki

2.602

0.439

<0.001

2.456

0.270

<0.001

Yamanashi

6.597

0.305

0.025

2.636

0.046

<0.001

Kumamoto

1.508

0.984

<0.001

2.190

0.078

<0.001

Nagano

5.135

0.262

0.011

1.964

0.318

<0.001

Oita

1.920

0.851

<0.001

2.317

0.497

<0.001

Gifu

2.539

0.492

<0.001

4.876

0.942

<0.001

Miyazaki

3.998

0.493

<0.001

4.916

0.575

0.004

Shizuoka

0.905

0.545

<0.001

1.206

0.949

<0.001

Kagoshima

1.335

0.294

<0.001

2.801

0.790

<0.001

Aichi

0.898

0.396

<0.001

1.101

0.886

<0.001

Okinawad

2.998

0.268

0.039

4.176

0.430

0.008

Mie

1.623

0.377

<0.001

2.549

0.700

<0.001

Total

0.081

0.006

<0.001

0.149

0.103

<0.001

  1. There were 40 df, except in Okinawa, where there were 32 df. The F test was used
  2. aResidual sum of squares
  3. b P value for the significance of period effects
  4. c P value for the significance of cohort effects
  5. dExcept for the period 1968–1972