Skip to main content

Table 1 Personal factors and effects of comfortable perceived thermal sensation during the winter and spring surveys

From: Certain personal and environmental factors as predictors of thermal sensation perceived by a population of students in a university setting from Timisoara, Romania: a case study

Personal factors

Winter (number)

Winter (%)

Spring (number)

Spring (%)

Gender

Male

68

44.16

77

52.38

Female

86

55.84

70

47.62

Age

19–30 years

154

100

147

100

BMI

<18.5

8

5.20

11

7.48

18.5–25

121

78.57

110

74.83

>25

25

16.23

26

17.69

Nationality

Romanian

54

35.06

46

31.29

Israeli

27

17.53

28

19.05

German

18

11.69

19

12.93

Italian

20

12.99

14

9.52

Greek

5

3.24

6

4.08

Syrian

4

2.60

3

2.04

Indian

4

2.60

4

2.72

Other

22

14.29

27

18.37

Illness state

Presence

19

12.33

11

7.48

Absence

135

87.67

136

92.52

Tiredness

Presence

75

48.70

69

46.94

 

Absence

79

51.30

78

53.06

Stress

Presence

42

27.27

85

57.82

 

Absence

112

72.73

62

42.18

 

Extremely sensitive

8

5.19

10

6.80

Sensitivity to cold

Very sensitive

42

27.27

33

22.45

Moderate sensitive

82

53.25

80

54.42

Slightly sensitive

22

14.29

24

16.33

Extremely sensitive

11

7.14

11

7.48

Sensitivity to hot

Very sensitive

38

24.68

39

26.53

Moderate sensitive

70

45.45

76

51.70

Slightly sensitive

35

22.73

21

14.29

Clothes

T-shirts

68

44.15

83

56.46

Laboratory coats

21

13.64

22

14.97

Jackets

20

12.99

12

8.16

Other clothes

28

18.18

26

17.69

Bonnet

2

1.30

2

1.36

Scarf

15

9.74

2

1.36

Effects of comfortable thermal sensation

 Attention

Concentrate better

52

33.77

72

48.98

 Feeling

Well

49

31.81

44

29.93

 Physically

Relaxed

44

28.57

21

14.29

 Understanding

Understand better

7

4.55

10

6.80

 Other

Other

2

1.30

0

0