Open Access

Association of excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy with birth weight: an adjunct study in Kumamoto of Japan Environment and Children’s Study

  • Xi Lu1Email author,
  • Masako Oda2,
  • Takashi Ohba3,
  • Hiroshi Mitsubuchi4,
  • Shota Masuda1 and
  • Takahiko Katoh1
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine201722:52

DOI: 10.1186/s12199-017-0656-1

Received: 7 March 2017

Accepted: 28 April 2017

Published: 8 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Low birth weight has been shown to be closely associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity, inhibited growth, poor cognitive development, and chronic diseases later in life. Some studies have also shown that excessive mobile phone use in the postnatal period may lead to behavioral complications in the children during their growing years; however, the relationship between mobile phone use during pregnancy and neonatal birth weight is not clear. The aim of the present study was to determine the associations of excessive mobile phone use with neonatal birth weight and infant health status.

Methods

A sample of 461 mother and child pairs participated in a survey on maternal characteristics, infant characteristics, and maternal mobile phone usage information during pregnancy.

Results

Our results showed that pregnant women tend to excessively use mobile phones in Japan. The mean infant birth weight was lower in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group, and the frequency of infant emergency transport was significantly higher in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group.

Conclusions

Excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy may be a risk factor for lower birth weight and a high rate of infant emergency transport.

Background

Birth weight is the body weight of a baby at birth [1]. There is a widespread belief that the birth weight of babies has increased in the last several years [2, 3]. However, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [4] reported that the mean neonatal birth weight in Japan decreased from 3.24 kg for boys and 3.15 kg for girls in 1975 to 3.04 kg for boys and 2.96 kg for girls in 2014 and that the rate of low-birth-weight infants (birth weight below 2500 g) increased from 4.7% for boys and 5.5% for girls in 1975 to 8.5% for boys and 10.7% for girls in 2014. Therefore, the mean birth weight of Japanese infants is decreasing steadily, and previous studies support this finding [5, 6]. Low birth weight has been shown to be closely associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity, inhibited growth, poor cognitive development, and chronic diseases later in life [7]. A previous study reported that low birth weight predisposes individuals to chronic diseases, such as ischemic heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, during adult life [8]. Maternal factors, such as primiparity, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal age, and multiple pregnancies, have been shown to be related with neonatal birth weight [8]; however, there is still no clarity on the relationship between many other factors and neonatal birth weight.

Recently, mobile phones have rapidly become important and widely available tools that are routinely used for a variety of purposes by a large number of people [912]. Most people have mobile phones and use them very often. Many people, especially the youth, use mobile phones to study, search for information on the Internet, play games, and communicate with others [13]. Some studies have shown that excessive mobile phone use may lead to a number of symptoms, such as headache, impaired concentration and memory, fatigue, and sleep disturbances [14, 15]. Additionally, excessive mobile phone use may negatively affect mental health and lead to depression, stress, and anxiety [914, 16].

Some studies reported that female individuals are prone to the adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use, and several studies have found that the levels of attachment to mobile phones and dependence on mobile phones are higher among female individuals than among male individuals [15, 1721]. In a previous study of young adults (n = 1415), it was found that female individuals aged 20 years or older were nearly three times more likely than male individuals to agree with the statement, “I cannot imagine life without the mobile” (25 vs. 9%) [15]. However, the association between neonatal birth weight and mobile phone use during pregnancy remains unclear. A previous cohort study reported associations of prenatal and, to a lesser extent, postnatal exposures to mobile phones with behavioral problems in children aged 7 years [22]; however, very little is known about the correlation.

The present study aimed to determine the associations of excessive mobile phone use with neonatal birth weight and infant health status and to provide basic data about excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy in a local area of Japan.

Methods

Data collection

Data were obtained from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) and JECS Adjunct Study in Kumamoto. In the JECS, three self-administered questionnaires and four medical record-transfer questionnaires were administered to the participants. Clinical measurements and biological samples were collected by trained nurses. The JECS included 103,106 expecting mothers, and the consent rate was 78.5%. The recruitment and exposure protocols are available elsewhere [23, 24]. The study in Kumamoto included 3012 mother-child pairs, and our study included data from only hospitals. Finally, we had 521 participants in our study.

In this study, we extracted basic data during pregnancy obtained with two maternal self-administered questionnaires and fetal data obtained with the first medical record-transfer questionnaire from JECS. Additionally, an original paper questionnaire in the JECS Adjunct Study was used to collect maternal mobile phone usage information during pregnancy (e.g., daily mobile phone use times, location of the phone during the day and at night, and power state (on/off) of the mobile phone during sleep). We distributed the questionnaire about daily mobile phone use when the expecting mothers were hospitalized before delivery or after delivery.

Igarashi et al. developed the Self-Perception of Text-Message Dependency Scale (STDS) for assessing text message dependency [25]. This self-reported scale measures the perception of people to their use of text messages and their attitudes toward compulsive text messaging in the context of interpersonal relationships. This scale consists of the following three subscales: emotional reaction, excessive use, and relationship maintenance. In the present study, a short version of the STDS was used. This version consists of 15 items with a 5-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree” and 5 = “strongly agree”). A higher score indicates greater dependency on text messaging and mobile phone use.

All expecting mothers from one rural area in Kumamoto, Japan, were considered for recruitment between 2012 and 2014. Recruitment was performed with the following two protocols: (1) recruitment at the time of the first prenatal examination at cooperating hospitals and (2) recruitment at local government offices.

Research participants

We enrolled 521 participants and excluded (1) those who did not complete the first or second trimester questionnaires (MT1 or MT2) or the first medical record-transfer questionnaire (Dr-0M); (2) those who did not complete the mobile phone daily usage questionnaire; (3) those with missing data for the maternal MT1, MT2, Dr-0M, or mobile phone daily usage questionnaire; and (4) those who had multiple pregnancies. Finally, 461 mother and child pairs were included in our analysis.

Outcome

Outcomes of this study were birth weight and infant health status (birth height, birth head circumference, birth chest circumference, mode of delivery, weeks of pregnancy, placental weight, low birth weight), infant emergency transport, and premature birth.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number (percentage). In our study, we used a cutoff of 15 points for the excessive use score in the STDS to determine excessive mobile phone use. Participants were divided into an ordinary use group (excessive use score ≤15 points) or excessive use group (excessive use score >15 points) [25]. For data analysis, we used the t test, χ 2 test, linear regression analysis, and logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A P value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The prevalence of excessive mobile phone use was 9.98% in our study. Table 1 shows the maternal characteristics and their differences between the ordinary and excessive use groups. Age at study entry was lower, the time of first use of a mobile phone was earlier, family income and education were lower, the frequencies of individuals who were unmarried and primiparous were higher, the sleeping time at night was later, the duration of playing games and using the mobile phone was longer, and the frequency of placing the mobile phone in the trouser or shirt pocket was higher in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group (all P < 0.05).
Table 1

Maternal characteristics and their differences between the normal and excessive use groups

Maternal characteristics

Total (N = 461)

Mobile normal user (N = 415)

Mobile excessive user (N = 46)

P value

Maternal age

29.54 (±5.35)

30.03 (±5.08)

25.09 (±5.70)

<0.001

Mobile start age, years

17.29 (±2.81)

17.48 (±2.80)

15.63 (2.33)

<0.001

Wight change during pregnancy

11.25 (±3.88)

11.20 (±3.85)

11.67 (±4.12)

0.44

Maternal BMI before pregnancy

21.49 (±3.01)

21.52 (±3.43)

21.13 (±3.16)

0.45

Maternal smoking

 Yes

29 (6.3%)

24 (5.8%)

5 (10.9%)

0.19

 No

432 (93.7%)

391 (94.2%)

41 (89.1%)

 

Marital status

 Single

31 (6.7%)

18 (4.3%)

13 (28.3%)

<0.001

 Married

430 (93.3%)

397 (95.7%)

33 (71.7%)

 

Employment status

 Full-time joba

111 (24.1%)

96 (23.1%)

15 (32.6%)

0.09

 Part-time job

152 (33.0%)

135 (32.5%)

17 (37.0%)

 

 Housewife

162 (35.1%)

152 (36.6%)

10 (21.7%)

 

 Independent business

18 (3.9%)

16 (3.9%)

2 (4.3%)

 

 No answers

18 (3.9%)

16 (3.9%)

2 (4.3%)

 

Family income, ¥ per year

 <4,000,000

255 (55.3%)

225 (54.2%)

30 (65.2%)

0.03

 4,000,000–7,999,999

141 (30.6%)

133 (32.0%)

8 (1.7%)

 

 8,000,000–11,999,999

15 (3.3%)

15 (3.6%)

0 (0%)

 

12,000,000

12 (2.6%)

11 (2.7%)

1 (2.1%)

 

 No answer

38 (8.2%)

31 (7.5%)

7 (15.2%)

 

Maternal schooling degree

 High schoola

253 (54.9%)

216 (52.0%)

37 (80.4%)

<0.001

 Collegeb

206 (44.7%)

197 (47.5%)

9 (19.6%)

 

 Otherwise

2 (0.4%)

2 (0.5%)

0 (0%)

 

Primiparity

 Yes

307 (66.6%)

281 (67.7%)

26 (56.5%)

<0.001

 No

154 (33.4%)

134 (32.3%)

20 (43.5%)

 

Time of laid up (excluding sleep), hours

5.00 (±3.68)

4.95 (±3.74)

5.57 (±2.93)

0.36

Time of watch TV, hours

2.67 (±2.05)

2.56 (±2.00)

3.59 (±2.27)

0.09

Time of playing game, minutes

28.0 (±56.5)

21.17 (±0.7)

89.90 (±1.8)

<0.001

Time of mobile use, minutes

133.7 (±191.4)

113.91 (±167.9)

314.91 (279.0)

<0.001

Designated spot for mobile

 Bag

364 (79.0%)

335 (80.7%)

29 (63.0%)

0.66

 Trouser pocket

48 (10.4%)

34 (8.2%)

14 (30.4%)

 

 Shirt pocket

5 (1.1%)

5 (1.2%)

0 (0%)

 

 Coat pocket

17 (3.7%)

14 (3.4%)

3 (6.5%)

 

 Others

27 (5.9%)

27 (6.5%)

0 (0%)

 

Designated spot for mobile

 Bag or coat pocket and others

408 (88.5%)

376 (90.6%)

32 (69.6%)

<0.001

 Trouser pocket or shirt pocket

53 (11.5%)

39 (9.4%)

14 (30.4%)

 

Bed time (time go to bed, PM)

10:54

10:54

11:48

<0.001

Power state of the mobile phone during sleep

   

0.65

 On

425 (92.2%)

381 (91.6%)

44 (95.7%)

 

 Usually on

22 (4.8%)

20 (4.8%)

2 (4.3%)

 

 Sometimes on

6 (1.3%)

6 (1.4%)

0 (0%)

 

 Off

8 (1.7%)

8 (1.9%)

0 (0%)

 

Location of the phone during sleep

   

0.33

 0.5 m from abdominal

115 (24.9%)

99 (23.9%)

16 (34.8%)

 

 1 m from abdominal

236 (51.2%)

216 (52.0%)

20 (43.5%)

 

 1.5 m from abdominal

62 (13.3%)

55 (13.3%)

7 (15.2%)

 

 2 m from abdominal

48 (10.4%)

45 (10.8%)

3 (6.5%)

 

Total sleep time (hours)

7.5 (±1.48)

7.5 (±1.46)

7.7 (±1.64)

0.35

Pregnancy complications

   

0.30

 Yes

12 (2.6%)

12 (2.9%)

0 (0%)

 

 No

449 (97.4%)

403 (97.1%)

46 (100%)

 

Obstetric labor complication

   

0.08

 Yes

219 (47.6%)

193 (46.5%)

27 (58.7%)

 

 No

241 (52.4%)

222 (53.5%)

19 (41.3%)

 

aIncluding junior high school

bIncluding technical college and junior college

Table 2 shows the infant characteristics and their differences between the ordinary and excessive use groups. The mean birth weight and birth chest circumference were higher in the ordinary use group than in the excessive use group (3167.16 ± 394.05 g vs. 3037.37 ± 324.87 g, P < 0.05, and 32.45 ± 1.65 cm vs. 31.94 ± 1.77 cm, P < 0.05, respectively). The frequency of emergency transportation was higher in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group (P < 0.05). However, the proportion of low-birth-weight infants was not significantly different between the two groups.
Table 2

Infant characteristics and their differences between the normal and excessive use groups

Infant characteristics

Total (N = 461)

Mobile ordinary user (N = 415)

Mobile excessive user (N = 46)

P value

Gender

 Boy

247 (53.6%)

227 (54.7%)

20 (43.5%)

0.15

 Girl

214 (46.4%)

188 (45.3%)

26 (56.5%)

 

Mode of delivery

 Transvaginal

386 (83.7%)

346 (83.4%)

40 (87.0%)

0.53

 Caesarean section

75 (16.3%)

69 (16.6%)

6 (13.0%)

 

Gestational age

39.39 (±1.18)

39.41 (±1.18)

39.21 (±1.18)

0.27

Birth weight (g)

3154.25 (±389.34)

3167.16 (±394.05)

3037.74 (±324.87)

0.03

Birth height (cm)

48.94 (±1.70)

48.93 (±1.72)

49.00 (±1.51)

0.792

Birth head circumference (cm)

33.35 (±1.38)

33.39 (±1.37)

32.98 (±1.43)

0.06

Birth chest circumference (cm)

32.40 (±1.67)

32.45 (±1.65)

31.94 (±1.77)

0.05

Placental weight (g)

587.74 (±111.76)

588.71 (±114.11)

579.00 (88.34)

0.50

Low birth weight

 1500–2500 g

16 (3.5%)

15 (3.6%)

1 (2.2%)

0.61

 >2500 g

445 (96.5%)

400 (96.4%)

45 (97.8%)

 

Premature birth

 Yes

14 (3.0%)

12 (2.9%)

2 (4.3%)

0.59

 No

447 (97.0%)

403 (91.7%)

44 (95.7%)

 

Emergency transport

 Yes

10 (2.2%)

7 (1.7%)

3 (6.5%)

0.03

 No

451 (97.8%)

408 (98.3%)

43 (93.5%)

 

On assessing the correlation between predictor variables and body weight, we found that maternal age, maternal body mass index before pregnancy, birth height, birth head circumference, birth chest circumference, and placental weight were positively correlated with birth weight. With regard to sex differences, the birth weight was lower in female infants than in male infants. However, maternal smoking history and excessive mobile phone use were not significantly correlated with birth weight. Additionally, primiparity and the designated location for the mobile phone were not significantly associated with birth weight. The correlation coefficient in univariate analysis in terms of the association of excessive mobile phone use with birth weight was −0.10 (P < 0.05).

We performed a linear regression analysis to identify the predictors of gestational age, birth weight, and low birth weight. The variables that showed statistical significance are presented in Table 3. Birth weight, birth chest circumference, and infant sex showed positive correlation with gestational age, while placental weight and primiparity had negative correlation. Birth chest circumference, birth height, placental weight, and maternal body mass index before pregnancy showed positive correlation with birth weight, while excessive mobile phone use showed negative correlation. Maternal age, birth height, maternal BMI before pregnancy, birth head circumference, primiparity, maternal smoking, excessive mobile phone use, maternal complications, and obstetric labor complications were predictors added in the analysis; however, they were deleted during analysis. There were only 16 low-birth-weight infants in our study. After linear regression analysis, only the chest circumference at birth had positive correlation with low birth weight, and other predictors were non-significant during analysis.
Table 3

Association between predictor variables and birth weight

Predictor variables

Gestational agea (N = 416)

Birth weightb (N = 416)

Low birth weight (<2500 g)c (N = 16)

 

B (95%CI)

B (95%CI)

B (95%CI)

 

31.55 (29.42~33.68)**

−6401.58 (−6943.38~−5859.78)**

−1198.61 (−2499.57~102.34)**

Birth weight

0.001 (0.001~0.002)**

Birth chest circumference

0.15 (0.06~0.25)**

112.25 (100.75~123.75)**

121.08 (75.95~166.22)**

Birth height

89.48 (78.90~100.07)**

Placental weight

−0.003 (−0.004~−0.002)**

0.60 (0.45~0.75)**

Maternal BMI before pregnancy

5.85 (1.67~10.03)**

Primiparity

−0.38 (−0.57~0.20)**

  

Infant sex

0.26 (0.07~0.44)**

Gestational age

27.09 (13.02~41.16)**

Mobile excessive use

−66.46 (−114.46~−18.46)**

** P < 0.01

a R 2 = 0.34, ANOVA P < 0.01. Predictor variables deleted during analysis: maternal age, birth height, maternal BMI before pregnancy, maternal age, birth head circumference, primiparity, maternal smoking, mobile excessive use, maternal complications, and obstetric labor complication

b R 2 = 0.85, ANOVA P < 0.01. Predictor variables deleted during analysis: maternal age, birth head circumference, primiparity, infant sex, maternal smoking, maternal complications, and obstetric labor complication

c R 2 = 0.70, ANOVA P < 0.001. Predictor variables deleted during analysis: maternal age, birth height, birth head circumference, placental weight, maternal BMI before pregnancy, primiparity, infant sex, gestational age, mobile excessive use, maternal smoking, maternal complications, and obstetric labor complication

We assessed emergency transport and premature birth between the ordinary and excessive use groups (Table 4). The risk of emergency transport was significantly higher in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group (crude OR = 4.07, 95%CI = 1.01–16.30; adjusted OR = 7.93, 95%CI = 1.40–44.85). The risk of premature birth was not significantly different between the ordinary and excessive use groups.
Table 4

Infant emergency transport and premature birth differences between the normal and excessive use groups

 

Infant emergency transport

Premature birth

 

Crude OR (95%CI)

Adjusted ORa (95%CI)

Crude OR (95%CI)

Adjusted ORa (95%CI)

Normal user

1

1

1

1

Excessive user

4.07 (1.01–16.30)*

7.93 (1.40–44.85)*

0.66 (0.14–3.02)

0.67 (0.09–4.97)

*P < 0.05

aAdjust for birth weight, birth height, birth head circumference, birth chest circumference, placental weight, maternal age, primiparity, maternal smoking, and maternal BMI before pregnancy

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study on the prevalence of excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy in Japanese women from a local area. Our study findings suggest that excessive mobile phone use in Japan is not limited to students and can be noted in adult women, even during pregnancy. The prevalence of excessive mobile phone use was 9.98%, which was higher than that reported among women employed in companies (5.4%) [16].

With regard to maternal characteristics, the maternal age and age at first use of a mobile phone were lower in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group. These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies [9, 16]. Young individuals tend to show high excitement and interest in the use of a new mobile phone. We also found that single mothers had excessive mobile phone use. The frequencies of loneliness, depression, and anxiety may be higher among single mothers than among mothers who have support during pregnancy. In a previous study, Shaw and Grant found that Internet chat alleviated loneliness and depression and increased perceived social support and self-esteem [26]. Additionally, Igarashi and Yoshida [27] found that among first-year university students, a higher frequency of text messaging at the beginning of the first semester was correlated with a lower feeling of loneliness at the end of the semester. We believe that single mothers need more time to use a mobile phone as a communication tool to maintain contact with others. We found that the family income and maternal schooling degree were lower in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group; however, we did not identify any previous study to support these results. Nonetheless, we believe that different income and education levels may influence mobile phone use frequency and habit. We also found that the excessive use group preferred to place the mobile phone in the trouser or shirt pocket, indicating that the excessive use group preferred to have the mobile phone in an easily accessible location.

With regard to infant characteristics, birth weight and chest circumference at birth were lower and the emergency transport rate was higher in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group. In the linear regression analysis, excessive mobile phone use was a significant predictor of low birth weight. In the logistic regression analysis, interestingly, we found that excessive mobile phone use increased the emergency transport rate, even after adjusting for confounding factors. Many factors affect the duration of gestation and fetal growth and, thus, the birth weight. They relate to the infant, mother, or physical environment and play important roles in determining birth weight and the future health of the infant. Our results showed that excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy may decrease infant birth weight, although this does not result in low-birth-weight infants. With regard to the mechanism, it has been shown that the levels of depression and state-trait anxiety are higher, and sleep quality is poorer in users who showed texting and digital audio player dependence than in ordinary users [28]. Another study reported that anxiety and dependence increased with daily smartphone usage and a high rate of nighttime awakening was noted, which, in turn, affected sleep [29]. Our study suggests that excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy may cause mental problems, such as anxiety and depression, and health problems, such as sleep problems and sleeplessness. We also found that the sleep time was later in the excessive use group than in the ordinary use group, and therefore, excessive users may have poor sleep quality; however, there was no significant difference in the total sleep duration between the excessive and ordinary use groups. The maternal health and mental problems may lead to a low birth weight and neonatal health, which may eventually necessitate infant emergency transport.

Limitations

The present study had some limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small, and therefore, it may not provide sufficient power to estimate the association between excessive mobile phone use and infant birth weight. The number of emergency transports was only 10, and there was a possibility of chance with regard to our finding. Second, we did not account for the potential effects of mental health, such as depression and anxiety, which were mainly noted in excessive mobile phone users and users with high dependency and may be predictors of birth weight. Third, all information was reported by the participants themselves; therefore, the reliability of the responses may not be high. Despite these limitations, our study had some merits and values. Finally, the subjects were not representative of all pregnant Japanese women, as they were recruited from a local area of Japan. Therefore, we might need a larger sample from all areas of Japan to verify our results. Although our research is important, there are many shortcomings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the prevalence of excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy in a local area in Japan.

Conclusions

Pregnant women tend to excessively use mobile phones in Japan. Excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy may be a risk factor for lower birth weight and a high rate of infant emergency transport.

Abbreviations

JECS: 

Japan Environment and Children’s Study

SD: 

Standard deviation

STDS: 

Self-Perception of Text-Message Dependency Scale

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the helpful comments from the editor and anonymous referees.

Funding

This study was partly supported by a grant for the JECS from the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the government.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as the data is not available to open now.

Authors’ contributions

XL and TK made the conception and design of this study. MO contributed to the acquisition of the data. TO, HM, and SM were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

1. Xi Lu is an assistant professor from the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.

2. Masako Oda is a senior lecturer from the Southern Kyushu and Okinawa Unit Center, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.

3. Takashi Ohba is an associate professor from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.

4. Hiroshi Mitsubuchi is a professor from the Department of Neonatology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Japan.

5. Shota Masuda is a graduate student and medical doctor from the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.

6. Takahiko Katoh is a professor from the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All presentations of case reports have consent to publish, and I can provide the consent form at any stage.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kumamoto University Graduate School of Life Sciences, and the committee’s reference number is Ethics No. 493. Participants were informed in advance that their participation was strictly voluntary and that all information provided would remain confidential. Participants had the option not to respond to any part of the questionnaire and could discontinue participation at any point.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University
(2)
The Southern Kyushu and Okinawa Unit Center, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University
(4)
Department of Neonatology, Kumamoto University Hospital

References

  1. “Birthweight: infant’s weight recorded at the time of birth”: definitions from the Georgia Department of Public Health, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Ananth CV, Wen SW. Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:260–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Odlind V, Haglund B, Pakkanen M, Otterblad Olausson P. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973–2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:516–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Annual Health. Labour and Welfare Report 2013-2014. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw8/dl/summary.pdf.
  5. Ohmi H, Hirooka K, Hata A, Mochizuki Y. Recent trend of increase in proportion of low birthweight infants in Japan. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1269–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Takimoto H, Yokoyama T, Yoshiike N, Fukuoka H. Increase in low-birth-weight infants in Japan and associated risk factors, 1980-2000. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31:314–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. United Nations Children’s Fund and World Health Organization. Low birthweight: country, regional and global estimates. New York: UNICEF; 2004.Google Scholar
  8. Terada M, Matsuda Y, Ogawa M, Matsui H, Satoh S. Effects of maternal factors on birth weight in Japan. J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:172395.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lu X, Chen Z, Uji M, Nagata T, Katoh T, Kitamura T. Use of mobile phone text message and personality among Japanese university students. Psychv Behav Sci. 2013;2:192–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Faulkner X, Culwin F. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers. 2005;17:167–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Leung L. Unwillingness-to-communicate and college students’ motives in SMS mobile messaging. Telematics Inform. 2007;24:115–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Salehan M, Negahban A. Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Comput Human Berav. 2013;29:2632–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Khan MM. Adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2008;21:289–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomee S, Harenstam A, Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults—a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Geser H. Are girls (even) more addicted? Some gender patterns of cell phone usage. Sociology in Switzerland: Sociology of the Mobile Phone. 2006. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/32700/ssoar-2006-geser-Are_girls_even_more_addicted.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar
  16. Lu X, Watanabe J, Liu Q, Uji M, Shono M, Kitamura T. Internet and mobile phone text-messaging dependency: factor structure and correlation with dysphoric mood among Japanese adults. Comput Human Behav. 2011;27:1702–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hakoama M, Hakoyama S. The impact of cell phone use on social networking and development among college students. AABSS J. 2011;15:1–20.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson LA, Zhao Y, Kolenic 3rd A, Fitsgerald HE, Harold R, Von Eye A. Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:437–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenaro C, Flores N, Gomez-Vela M, Gonzalez-Gil F, Caballo C. Problematic Internet and cell-phone use: psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addict Res Theory. 2007;15:309–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Leung L. Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, addiction: symptoms and patterns of cell phone use. In: Mediated Interpersonal Communications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 359–81.Google Scholar
  21. Wei R, Lo VH. Staying connected while on the move: cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media Soc. 2006;8:53–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 2008;19:523–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K, Toda E, Tsukamoto N, Hasegawa M, et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Japan Environment and Children’s Study homepage. https://www.env.go.jp/en/chemi/hs/jecs/.
  25. Igarashi T, Motoyoshi T, Takai J, Yoshida T. No mobile, no life: self-perception and text-message dependency among Japanese high school students. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24:2311–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaw LH, Grant LM. In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002;5:157–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Igarashi T, Yoshida T. The effects of the use of mobile phone text messages on freshmen’s loneliness during transition to college. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2003;74:379–85 [Article in Japanese].View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferraro FR, Holfeld B, Frankl S, Frye N, Halvorson N. Texting/iPod dependence, executive function and sleep quality in college students. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;49:44–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosen L, Carrier LM, Miller A, Rokkum J, Ruiz A. Sleeping with technology: cognitive, affective, and technology usage predictors of sleep problems among college students. Sleep Health. 2016;2:49–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement